![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: scilly
Posts: 888
|
I was wondering how you guys shoot up close portraits at wide apertures say f1.4 to f2. Especially when the model is not facing the photographer straight on and his/her eyes are not along the same plane. The DOF will be so thin only one eye will be focus. How do I go about at least getting both eyes sharp? PP?
Is there any special focusing technique that will enable me to overcome this one eye in-focus predicament? When taking photography of people where spectacles, where should focus be? You get to at times get the spectacles frame in focus most of the time. Note, I am using manual focus but I suppose it applies to both MF and AF. Maybe some gurus can share their techniques with all of us? ps: i like shooting wide open and throwing the background off. Using a 50mm |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Former CS Senior Member
Posts: 3,067
|
very good question. i'll leave it to the pros to comment.
![]() on side note, when you get closer to subject you need not shoot at 1.4 or 2 right? why not you try shooting at a distance with 1.4 or 2 and then get closer and shoot 4 or so. and then compare the backgrounds and see what are the difference apart from the angles. my $10 worth ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: scilly
Posts: 888
|
pros? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Stevens Rd
Posts: 1,749
|
DOF has a direct co-relation with how far you're shooting your subject... If you intend to shoot wide open, You can opt to stand farther back.... however, if you're using a prime... that might lead to composition limitations.... (85 1.2 almost always have a problem if u're 4 ft away and shooting wide open, unless the eyes are dead on the same plane)
so if you're intending to get the MAX bokeh while keeping the eye sharp, you'll need to make some composition trails and as well as know what distance works for that particular piece of lens. If you wanna get in close .... then check the DOF and find one that works.... u don't need 1.2 to get creamy bokeh ... 1.6 can get creamy too if you're close... .. even 2.8 can ![]() ![]()
__________________
Visit the new www.ejunlow.com Last edited by ejunlow; 10th February 2009 at 03:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: scilly
Posts: 888
|
thanks ejun!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 513
|
ya good info oso.... ![]() chers |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Former CS Senior Member
Posts: 3,067
|
the basics of depth of field.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where the action is
Posts: 1,311
|
On my Sigma 50mm, f1.4 seems to be on the soft side. The bokeh using f2-2.8 is great, while anything above f3.5 is on the harsh side.
__________________
In search of excellence in photography. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: scilly
Posts: 888
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 91
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: scilly
Posts: 888
|
![]() i was curious. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|