![]() |
|
|||||||
| Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Punggol
Posts: 3,985
|
Hey guys! Santa's a little late, but he's personally promised a 70-200 2.8IS on the last day of the year!
![]() Alright, so my normal go-to kit would comprise of the gripped 400D, 17-40L, 70-200 2.8IS and one 580EXII. That's no problem at all for my Lowepro Primus AW. It's only when I'm shooting seriously, when I have 2 bodies and 2 flashes, that my problem comes in. So here I am asking-- what bag would fit: ++Gripped body + 70-200 2.8IS mounted + hood ++Ungripped body + 17-40L mounted + 17-55 hood ++2xflashes, either internally or externally ++Water bottle, either internally or externally My first thought was this (excuse the disproportionate sizing): ![]() Above, in a backpack (front view) or in a shoulder bag (top view) and my second thought was: ![]() In a shoulder bag, front view. Does anyone have anything in mind? If the bag has a sliplock / additional mounting option, I can use my Lowepro 60AW for the 2 flashes and / or my lowepro water bottle bag. Cheers, Zexun
__________________
Our pictures are our footprints. It’s the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,376
|
how about getting a messenger bag or backpack and simply put everything in it. Not glamourous but works and is cheaper too.
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Punggol
Posts: 3,985
|
I'd want the padding, and iirc the cost of the padding + the bag + not knowing if the bag can take the weight would probably be close to a dedicated camera bag already.
__________________
Our pictures are our footprints. It’s the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|