![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 147
|
![]() Would like to get feedback on the composition of this photo taken at around dusk. The subject in this photo is the structure. The rocks/pebbles in the foreground serves as a foreground interest, and hopefully the blue sky doesn't make the top part too bland, although some clouds formation would be nice. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,307
|
the rocks and pebbles are not significant enough to be a foreground interest - in fact, what rocks and pebbles? what i see in the foreground is the reflection of the lights.
i thought extending the exposure timing a wee bit longer, by stopping down your aperture, would be great. it would at the very least smoothen out the reflection of the lights a little bit more. would also crop this to a more squarish format. all in all, this is not a bad shot, but it is nothing "out of the ordinary", i.e. nothing spectacular. it looks like there was wind during the shot roughing up the water surface.. if you find it in you, go back to the spot until you get a windless day, a more perfect reflection may give that extra bit more. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,229
|
Warm and cool colour compliments each other, maybe can add an effect filter to accentuate the street lamp ?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: serangoon
Posts: 1,578
|
would the composition look better if more of the sky was included? meaning the more parts of the river not being included in the frame.
__________________
40D+17-50 f/2.8+30 f/1.4+430EXII www.pplneedthelord.blogspot.com l www.flickr.com/pplneedthelord |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 935
|
i think in your case the subject is horizontal, a landscape composition may be nicer. since the sky of not much interest, i would shoot 1/4 water, 3/4 subject (taking into nightmare's comments on flat water to get a clear reflection of the subject).
Last edited by pokiemon; 22nd December 2008 at 04:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 147
|
See what you mean with the smoothing of reflections from your Valencia's series, it is It should work with a more dramatic sky. ![]() Thanks to all for the comments. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,563
|
the picture is clean and orderly which is good. but the sky isn't really that dramatic. i felt pokiemon crop shows a better perspective because it is tighter. probably you can go nearer to the highway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 147
|
Haha, can't get any closer, cos my legs were in the water already
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|