![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central
Posts: 107
|
Hi all I currently using a Canon 450D with the kit lens 18 to 55mm. I would like to get a telezoom lens but I am not very sure which to get. I am looking for a lens maybe up to 300 to 400mm and able to give me a wide angle e.g. 50 to 400mm
So my questions are: 1) any lens that you would recommend and the price, 2) is it necessary that I have to calibrate the lens with the camera? Or can I just fix it on and start snapping away? 3) What are the thing that i need to look out for when getting a new lens Thank You! =) Last edited by xcess; 19th December 2008 at 07:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,369
|
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,561
|
Your idea of "all-in-one" lens might sound tempting but the trade-off is image quality. SLR means: use the right lens for the right purpose. That's why you can chose from the long list. Some people use lenses like Tamron 18-200 for traveling and as 'walkaround' lens.
1) You can check the Canon Lens Price guide in the Canon Equipment section for the lenses available and the prices for a first idea. For budget lens check EFS 55-250. 2) Nothing required, put on and snap. 3) Optical check, functional tests, warranty card. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 72
|
If u really wan a lens with a big zoom... These are the lens i can think of that i feel its not bad.. Canon 18-200.... Tamron 18-270... Canon 100-400... Sigma 120-400.... Sigma 150-500... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central
Posts: 107
|
Thanks for the quick response =)
If i were to get a lens with a big range, the picture quality will not be as good? How about if i were to go for something like a 100 to 400mm? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 72
|
Maybe i can say mostly short range lens is better, but it depends on which lens u comparing....
If u talking about 100-400, i believe u talking about the canon lens.. There are quite a few ppl using the lens in this forum, in fact there are a few topics on it too... Personally i think its a lens worth considering, the down point is the weight and price.. Personally if i need a long tele lens, i would consider the last 3 which i list out... Then consider other lens to cover the shorter range.... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central
Posts: 107
|
Yup it's the Canon... But for low light condition it's not very good rite?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,369
|
I found it easier simply to use a camcorder with night vision. Sony has prosumer cameras and camcorders with Night function.
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 72
|
But if u talking about aperture, this lens when didnt zoom out is already at F4.5, when fully zoom out is at 5.6... So u will have to have a high ISO in order to have a faster shutter speed to freeze the object if your object is moving in low light condition... But most of the zoom tele lens is about this aperture... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central
Posts: 107
|
Well i like to shoot sports and a mixture of wild life too... I am also looking at the 70 - 300mm range.
Btw... 1) EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM 2) EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM What is the III in 1) and DO in 2)??? Thanks... |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|