![]() |
|
|||||||
| Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 95
|
Having read the Nikon lenses to Olympus adapter thread, I was inspired to order an adaptor from Tagotech.
Now that I have received it, I am still undecided as to which lens to go for. My motivation here is low light shooting, as well as portrait shots. Can you guys with Nikon lenses please share your experience? Thanks!
__________________
◄Halogen¶╝ |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Singapore
Posts: 2,146
|
I don't have any Nikkor lenses,but what i would want would probably be about 70mm efov on the 35mm film,was looking at the list and the Nikkor manual lens 35mm f1.8 if i'm not wrong caught my attention
__________________
Olympus E-1 & E-3 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 453
|
go for those nikon lens that got aperture rings.
50mm f1.4 is a good choice. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Former CS Senior Member
Posts: 3,067
|
hahaha i poisoned u! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 95
|
Yes, i should say poisoned, and not inspired! ![]()
__________________
◄Halogen¶╝ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,986
|
35mm f1.4, 50mm f1.4, might be good lenses to explore should you want to shoot with super thin DOF. They aren't cheap though.
__________________
Discuss and Share on Facebook |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
I have a Nikkor 50/1.4 which I am happy with, although I must admit, I prefer using the Oly 50/2. I'd love to see what the 35/1.4 can do but I am probably not prepared to pay the price for it.
"Which lens..." is normally not answerable because all depends on you budget and the type of use you had in mind.
__________________
Welcome to my Blog: http://olyflyer.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 95
|
My budget is not $$$... or else I will be looking at the Sigma 30/1.4 or the ZD 50/2. The Nikkor 50/1.8 seems the best value to me at the moment, although I won't mind paying a bit more to get a 1.4.
__________________
◄Halogen¶╝ |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
I had no idea there was an OM 50/2, I only know of the ZD 50/2 macro. If I were you I'd get an OM 50/1.8. Better then Nikkor 1.8
__________________
Welcome to my Blog: http://olyflyer.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 95
|
One of the reasons I chose the Nikon adaptor was the greater availability of used Nikon lenses in the Buy/Sell section here. Perhaps I jumped the gun a bit... there was an OM 50/1.8 + adaptor for sale here early this week!
__________________
◄Halogen¶╝ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|