![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sembawang, Singapore
Posts: 151
|
Dear All Gurus
Im the user or Canon 350D, now i got think to upgrade, but i have 2 choices either 1000D or 450D, from the price it almost same, just slightly different, so i need the advice from all of you, which one the better one, is it 450D or 1000D ? Heard some rumors that 1000D is a lousy camera if its compare with 450D even with my existing 350D ? any advice ? Thanks Regards SR1688 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,567
|
Why do you want to upgrade? What features or functions of the 1000D or 450D do you need and which are not available with the 350D?
There are numerous pages in Internet comparing the specs of these camera. read them carefully. If something is 'lousy' or not depends on the intended purpose and the person's skills to use the camera .. and sometimes on the quality. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Singapore, NE
Posts: 266
|
I compared the 450D vs 1000d and decided to go on 1000d because i sharing with my sis whom prefers 1000d unit weight and 1000d promo gives me a 75-300mm len for 59.00 plus the gifts were more attractive....more important i am a newbie and dont need to use the advanced features of 450d....i am considering spending on a good lens and learn the skills to shoot a good photo.
__________________
____________________________________ 1000D w/EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Lens /75-300mm /18-55mm |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: serangoon
Posts: 1,579
|
since you're using a 350D now i would say go for the 450D.
__________________
40D+17-50 f/2.8+30 f/1.4+430EXII www.pplneedthelord.blogspot.com l www.flickr.com/pplneedthelord |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16
|
Go for the 450D.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,387
|
450D anytime. 1000D is really a redundant release - it's almost a 350D Mark II.
Anyway, looks like you're already very comfortable with xxxD series' built and functions, else, the 40D is definitely worth considering. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: serangoon
Posts: 1,579
|
i've got to disagree with you here. i used to think that way till a friend explained it to me. the 1000D is much more user friendly for a newbie compared to the 450D. its designed such a way that it suits more for the newbies. every camera has its pros and cons
__________________
40D+17-50 f/2.8+30 f/1.4+430EXII www.pplneedthelord.blogspot.com l www.flickr.com/pplneedthelord |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 318
|
I had 1000D and I say go for 450D. Reason... spot metering. There is no spot metering in 1000D.
__________________
www.flickr.com/kenkht |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Singapore, NE
Posts: 266
|
Spot metering ? what it does?
__________________
____________________________________ 1000D w/EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Lens /75-300mm /18-55mm |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 28
|
IMHO, keep your 350D, save enough and go to 40/50D.
not point changing within the same level of expertise. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: serangoon
Posts: 1,579
|
that may be true. but it also depends on TS budget as well.
__________________
40D+17-50 f/2.8+30 f/1.4+430EXII www.pplneedthelord.blogspot.com l www.flickr.com/pplneedthelord |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,200
|
Keep your 350D, which is a good camera, unless you are looking for 5fps, ISO3200, better WB and spot metering than 350D.
I purchased a 2nd hand 20D which cost only 60% of my 350D price and I am very happy with my 20D. Now 350D become my backup camera.
__________________
Canon EOS 350D/20D, Canon EF 20-35 f/2.8 L, EF 70-200 f/4.0 L, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro, EF 28-80 L |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,376
|
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: behind the viewfinder
Posts: 979
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 449
|
how abt comparison of 450D and 20D
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,376
|
For that...might as well get Pentax K200D at $1000-ish local with included dual kit lens. beats the 450D and 20D in my opinion + the body is weather-sealed and uses AA rather then proprietary batteries. from your requirements, looks like you dont really need liveview at all. The K200D when looked closer can be considered an average working man`s Pro body.
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 449
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|