![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 41
|
![]() I am pretty new to photography and i like taking obscure objects. I took this fire hydrant in Delta Road, with my new Oly OM Zuiko 50mm f1.8 on E510. I kind of like the number for this one. I was trying to capture the crusty details (uneven surface of the hydrant) on the fire hydrant. Will it be better to do so with a macro lens close up? (thought i dont have any macro lens as of yet) I wish to know from experts here about the composition. And most importantly if my technique is wrong or something. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 609
|
Matter of factly this picture works for me.
Colours stands out, rule of thirds is observed, and you've managed to make the background bokeh-ed such that there aren't distracting elements in there. I don't think a macro lens will do much in creating a better picture for this one. Well, I've never used a true macro lens before either. Image looks too contrasty, even though it suits my taste. The greens steal attention from the subject as well, and would be more successful in doing so if not for the bokeh. Good take, but you probably have done too much post processing to it? Out of curiousity, what's the interest for #41? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: serangoon
Posts: 1,578
|
on first glance, i felt that the picture didn't suit the title. Yes the picture may have shown a fire hydrant, but the numbers caught my eye first.
would it be better if you took the Whole fire hydrant instead? with an f/1.8 lens you still can play around with depth of field(DOF) at that distance away.
__________________
40D+17-50 f/2.8+30 f/1.4+430EXII www.pplneedthelord.blogspot.com l www.flickr.com/pplneedthelord |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 812
|
I feel that the crop for this pic is too tight. Would had moved 2-3 steps back...
__________________
My Humble Flickr --> The pavement of my thoughts |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 41
|
But i guess you are right... the post processing was overdone =(
thank you all for the inputs! =p |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: near the Equator
Posts: 1,257
|
Like the rest have mentioned, take a step back, and try not to cut your hydrant's top and sides.
As for the colors, they work for me. Reds and greens form a good blend of contrasts. The hydrant's aim is to stand out for ease of sight, hence, it works.
__________________
We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities. - Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Upper Thomson
Posts: 400
|
the nonos:
1) too much pp, the colours are too saturated, but if you intended it to be dramatic, then yes, you'v really succeeded 2) the crop of the shot, all sides are fine with me, EXCEPT the TOP!!! the frame cuts off the top of the hydrant, distracting and, for a picky person like me, i don't like my subject to have weird parts cut off 3) the top left corner has a bit of light coming in (or is it just my eyes and monitor?) haha, distracting lah the dof is damn good, i like the chain and the effect the bokeh has given it. nice attention to the number on the hydrant too. and i like the colours, very nice feel, chirstmasy (green and red). hahaha. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 600060
Posts: 1,267
|
Suggestion;
You could have taken it top down, while still getting the 41. I believe the hydrant is among a patch of grass, so with the top down at a good angle; would would still get the red vs green AND the full length of the "arms".
__________________
Already abused my D40 and D80 for my flickr |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|