![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
|
Hi Guys
Would be getting my first DSLR [Nikon D90] over the weekends ![]() the problem is I can't decided over the lens bundle. the choices: 18-105mm VR , 18-55mm , 55-200mm currently what i was thinking is that either the 18-105mm VR by itself or the 18-55mm + 55-200mm pairing ![]() wonder whats u guys think is the better choice? I would be mostly doing photojournalism stuff.. with the need of both wide and zoom lens ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 80
|
Maybe u want to get the D90 body without the kit lens and get the 18-200mm lens separately to go along with it. I bought mine 2mths ago without regret.
Happy shooting! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 58
|
Since its your first DSLR, my humble suggestion is get the kit first. The kit lens is good for most shootings and you can always let go later still at a good price.
18-55mm is one of the good lens out there sharper than kit and 18-200mm. Try out first no hurry rite? ^.^
__________________
Nikon D700|D70IR : NIKON 14-24 f2.8 : NIKON 24-70 f2.8 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SGee
Posts: 1,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
|
Actually i was tinking those lens with long range e.g. the 18-105mm & 18-200mm lens, what are the pros and cons of such lens really? cos i have no idea, other than the 'fuss-free' and sharpness factor u guys already meationed ?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SGee
Posts: 1,568
|
with 1 lense,
pros: . no lense change = less dirty image sensor . faster respond time . economise on size & weight cons: . picture quality may not match seperate lenses (colour, sharpness, distortion, chromatic aberration may suffer) how wide angle would u like? sometimes the focal length may be a factor in choosing ur gears. for me, i have a 12-24mm + 28-135mm for my Canon with a 1.6X crop. Last edited by sORe-EyEz; 5th December 2008 at 01:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,359
|
If serious photojournalism then 18-105mm as you dont want to be caught off guard when a picture opportunity arises. Only if you are experienced and know by instinct what lens you want then you go for a variable lens system.
__________________
My Blog/Video/Photo Archive. Photography||Videography||Post services available with quotation. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
|
i got a 18-105mm and my friend got a 18-55mm and the image he have is sharper then mine .. but the problem he always complain is "he can't zoom far like mi "
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,540
|
Image sharpness is affected by many factors. The longer your focal length the more you are susceptible to shake by your hands. That's why a lot of longer lenses come with IS now. It's easier to get sharp pictures hand held with shorter focal length. If you really want to compare then use a tripod, remote shutter (or timer) and equal aperture / focal length settings and also equal camera settings (JPEG parameters).
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bukit Panjang
Posts: 502
|
i would go for the 18-55mm and 55-200mm combo.
After painful spending, I realised that going for an all-in-one lens often give unsatisfactory results.
__________________
|SonyA700|T180mmf3.5|M50mmf1.7|M70-210mmf4|S17-35mmf2.8-4|S30mmf1.4|T17-50mmf2.8|T90mmf2.8|M5600hsd| |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
|
Wow. Thx for all the replies guys..
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|