No offense to Mattlock, but people looking at our post IS an issue. If we were to look at TNP Sunday again, a screen shot of a XMM was in place with the face blurred out. If I am not mistaken, it came from Flipfreak. Well executed as the photos might have been, the point is that CS is fast becoming fodder for the press and authorities alike. As it has been stated in the TNP yesterday, that MDA will clamp down on on objectionable material posted, giving a field day for the moral police (I for one hate to use morals, but in this case, I will make an exception).
It just takes 2 to 3 minutes to sign up and register with CS as a member. In that sense, no surprises here that the Mods have remarked a 4x the subscription rate. I can bet my arse that 65% of those pple who sign up, are looking for kicks at the XMM photos posted. 25% are people who just want in on the shoot of XMM and 10% are pro bono. In the case of the subscription fee as stated, it serves as a deterrent point for people who just sign up looking for kicks or even taking XMM pics for whatever reason. It makes them think twice.
One thing for sure is that this measure cannot weed out whoever is trying to jack the forum for whatever purpose. But we cannot have a one size fit all solution to please the masses. As it is, it is damn if you do and damn if you don't case. So at this point, looking at it from the Admin or Mods perspective, a viable solution is something we need right now. If there is a possibility that a suggestion might work, then it is worth a shot.
Whether it will throw newbies like me off, that is something that for the start yes, to be very honest. But which other forum can a noob get an honest opinion about the pics he took? None. So unless the person is just in for the kicks as opposed to one who is serious about the craft, then we can be sure that he is someone we should be looking out for.
There she said...that indecent proposal was the last thing she expected when she posted in CS
fetish is what she specialise in, and if you search fetish in Deviantart, look at what the results will be...
she is simply asking for it...and wow at 6mths to 1 year experience, she is charging $100 - $200 /hr
Should we send this to TNP and check the "models" credibility...I'll let you guys decide
I guess this is how people describe as slapping themselves.
so just because TNP says MDA will clamp down on objectionable material, means that we have been putting up objectionable material? I don't see the logic here. The stuff posted up here is tamer than what's being shown in FHM , Maxim, and Playeur. and they are PUBLISHED, one by Mediacorp one by SPH (but now closed) and one by Viscion. If girls in lingerie was legally objectionable then they would all be out of business.