![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10
|
Hi all again, its the super newbie kenxo again
I just came back from the barrage, yeah, its 3.30 in the morning and never felt so compelled to ask for answers again to my new found hobby. I do not know why, but my pictures appears SO GRAINY, especially at the black (darker parts), the picture's not clear or crips, despite me setting ISO to just 100. Settings for the below picture is F7.1 Speed of 5 sec and ISO of 100 using my a300. After i took the picture, i could even notice the GRAINS on my LCD (which is that bad), is it a technical fault or is it some settings that i have so ignorantly set.Do advise... ps i am trying to post a sample of the picture, but i cant seem to do it on this thread. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,267
|
There's a possibility you set your DRO pretty high maybe?
Anyway, there's a sticky in the Newbie's Corner about forum FAQs. One of them is how to post pictures.
__________________
Alpha |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 359
|
Use neat image on your images should fix the noise.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 369
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastern Singalalapore
Posts: 516
|
lol, i use neat image too, but i find noiseware to be a little more effective at keeping the details.
http://www.imagenomic.com/nwpg.aspx
__________________
Snap snap away! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 59
|
Disable DRO like wad Rashkae wrote.
__________________
Father Earth is sick.Care for him & let him recuperate, OR, come up with a cure to restore his form. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,267
|
Ok, I've taken a look at the pictures, and they're not noisy actually. In fact, for a 30 second exposure, they're very clean. The main thing that I noticed is that they are slightly blurred, most likely because you are shooting at f/20, where lens diffraction kicks in. I suggest reducing your aperture to f/11 or so instead. You'll then also be able to reduce the required exposure time.
__________________
Alpha |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10
|
many thanks for all your inputs...appreciate them, i will try again, on another not too sleepy nite
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,267
|
If you still have problems, let us know, we'll meet up in the evening and help you get better shots
__________________
Alpha |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
I would suggest don't shoot at smaller than f/16... for most lenses diffraction softening occurs at around f/16 with f/16 being acceptable... I tend to shoot at f/8 or f/16
. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|