ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 19th November 2008   #1
gumnaam
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hougang, Singapore
Posts: 320
Default Maximum Tripod load

HI Guys,

I have Manfrotto 190xprob with Giotto MH 1001-652 ball head. From specs the maximum weight supported by head is 5 Kg ( and tripod is 8.5 Kg). I use the following setup

Canon 40 D - 750gm
Canon 100 mm f 2.8 macro - 600 gm
Canon 430 EX - 300 gm

Total weight comes out to be 1.650 Kg, to be on safe side lets take as 2 Kg... still the setup is much below the max load of the tripod + head. When i put my cam on live view, i can see the scene is not stable ( as expected), rather there is some visible shaking.


Is there any problem with my setup, or the way i use it.


Help.......
__________________
EOS 40D/10-20,50,100 macro,
My Flickr
gumnaam is offline  
Old 19th November 2008   #2
Kit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,031
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Are you seeing movement to the tripod head only or the entire setup? I'm suspecting that te tripod head is not capable of holding your gears in position.
Kit is offline  
Old 19th November 2008   #3
Flashbulb
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 532
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

depends on the tripod feet also. If the ground is shaking, it will affect the tripod as well.
__________________
I photograph the dead.
Flashbulb is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 19th November 2008   #4
gumnaam
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hougang, Singapore
Posts: 320
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Originally Posted by Kit View Post
Are you seeing movement to the tripod head only or the entire setup? I'm suspecting that te tripod head is not capable of holding your gears in position.
The movement is comming from head... mostly from the joint between plate and head....... the release point.... i thought the max load is 5 Kg.....that's why wasn't sure if head is source of trouble.......is there any suggestion, that we should go for twice or 3 times the max your gears.....
__________________
EOS 40D/10-20,50,100 macro,
My Flickr
gumnaam is offline  
Old 19th November 2008   #5
gumnaam
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hougang, Singapore
Posts: 320
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Originally Posted by Flashbulb View Post
depends on the tripod feet also. If the ground is shaking, it will affect the tripod as well.
Thanks Flashbulb... but the legs are stable......and that i tried inside park. land was hard so no ground shaking
__________________
EOS 40D/10-20,50,100 macro,
My Flickr
gumnaam is offline  
Old 19th November 2008   #6
psychobiologist
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,267
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

its the head... and plate type..
__________________
chezburgr i can haz?
psychobiologist is offline  
Old 19th November 2008   #7
gumnaam
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hougang, Singapore
Posts: 320
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Originally Posted by psychobiologist View Post
its the head... and plate type..
Thanks bro... but what's the solution for it. Any recomendations?
__________________
EOS 40D/10-20,50,100 macro,
My Flickr
gumnaam is offline  
Old 20th November 2008   #8
Dream Merchant
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,148
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Just looking at the size of that head, I doubt if it can take anything more than a kg.

Stability also depends on how much you extend your tripod legs and center column, wind conditions etc.

Ballheads are not the most stable/secure around, unless you look at the Swiss made stuff above $500. Even a cheap manfrotto 141 3-way pan and tilt head would be as stable as a rock in comparison. Used 141s go for as low as $50 here in CS. They're big and heavy, but like I said, ROCK SOLID!
Dream Merchant is offline  
Old 20th November 2008   #9
denniskee
Senior Member
 
denniskee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: bukit batok
Posts: 4,212
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

i am using giottos mh 1303series, rated at 5kg(not sure what is the method of measurement).

with a canon d60 + 100mm lens + 550ex, totally not stable. but my intention for the head is for compact camera or mounting slave flash or use with mono-pods for tele lens.

think of it this way, why would some ball head with similar load rating be of much bigger?
__________________
photography makes one sees things from all angles.
denniskee is offline  
Old 20th November 2008   #10
gumnaam
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hougang, Singapore
Posts: 320
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

Originally Posted by denniskee View Post
i am using giottos mh 1303series, rated at 5kg(not sure what is the method of measurement).

with a canon d60 + 100mm lens + 550ex, totally not stable. but my intention for the head is for compact camera or mounting slave flash or use with mono-pods for tele lens.

think of it this way, why would some ball head with similar load rating be of much bigger?
Bro, then which head are u using, that gives u stable setup..
__________________
EOS 40D/10-20,50,100 macro,
My Flickr
gumnaam is offline  
Old 21st November 2008   #11
denniskee
Senior Member
 
denniskee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: bukit batok
Posts: 4,212
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

the other ball head i am using is manfrotto488rc0, i choose this for 2 reason :

1) it has a seperate panning lock compare to 486. so it helps alot when doing pano and panning.

2) rc0 over rc2 cause rc0 has a bobble level on the head. so dont need another hot shoe mounted bubble level.

however rc0 is heavier than rc2. also, 488series is know to move a wee bit when u tighten the ball head.

if i have not buy the 488 head, i will probably go for Giotto's MH 1301, Weight: 1.38 lbs., Max. Load: 25 lbs. cause i find the finishing and operation is better than my 488 (tested recently at op at sim lim).

next higher grae ball head like markin q3 (korean) and Kangrinpoche (china), it is alot cheaper and i can live with the "flaw" of 488.

the problem with the load ratings given by manufacturer is, no body knows how did they conduct the test. so only use it as a rough guide. always test the head urself.
__________________
photography makes one sees things from all angles.

Last edited by denniskee; 21st November 2008 at 01:49 AM.
denniskee is offline  
Old 21st November 2008   #12
Deadpoet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,408
Default Re: Maximum Tripod load

If you are on a budge, use a pan and tilt head. For the same price of your Gittos, you can get an excellent pan and tilt head.

The Gittos you got, I will not put anything more than a heavy PnS or the lightest DSLR with it's kit lens on it.

Btw, you really need to know what you are shooting and then get the equipment you need. A ball head is made for easy operation, the ability to point to anywhere you want to shoot with ease. You are looking at a macro set up, and that is not what a ball head is best for. Of course, you can use an Arca Swiss, which will blow most budget. For your macro set up, got for a pan and tilt.
__________________
deadpoet
my portfolio
Deadpoet is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.09019 seconds with 7 queries