ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 15th November 2008   #1
Fishmaster
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 32
Default Macro, minimum focusing distance?

I just got this Sigma 70-210 lens and it looks something like this:
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6637/22978145vc4.jpg

The focusing ring cannot go beyond the 1.2m mark and yet there is a MACRO written down there. The manual also writes something like "With Sigma zoom lenses, you will enjoy macro photography simply and easily."

Question is, how am I supposed to 'enjoy macro photography' when I have to be at least 1200mm away from my subject to have it in focus? Is it because I have yet to understand what 'macro' actually means?

It is really making me wonder.. and if you are wondering too, the manual isn't of much help at all.

Can someone help me out on this?
Fishmaster is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #2
ngck12
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: beside jurong point
Posts: 468
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

magnification is only 1 to 4.7. not other macro lenses which are 1 to 1.
ngck12 is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #3
night86mare
Senior Member
 
night86mare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,330
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

oh.. this is not a true macro lens..

not even close 1:4.7 is not proper magnification by any standards.
__________________
Gallery | Dreamscapes 09
Pentaxian 伪君子之所以更可憎
night86mare is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 15th November 2008   #4
Fishmaster
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 32
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Thanks for your replies. I am quite confused now...

On a Canon 28-135 lens, http://jianghai.smugmug.com/photos/102571701-L-1.jpg, the 'macro' on the focusing ring relates to the minimum focusing distance that I can keep the subject in focus, e.g. under 1m working distance. But on the Sigma lens, I have to be at least 1.2m from the subject to have it in focus even though it is at 'macro' on the focusing ring.

So what does 'macro' actually mean? Is it the ability of a lens to retain a 1:1 magnification or the ability of a lens to focus on subjects at close distances, e.g. >100mm? .. Magnification.. or close-up?

Edit: It seems to me that 'macro' on the Sigma lens refers to the 1:4.7 magnification while 'macro' on the Canon lens is the minimum focusing distance that the lens can achieve, yup?

Last edited by Fishmaster; 15th November 2008 at 04:38 AM.
Fishmaster is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #5
parampita
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 昭南島
Posts: 2,032
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Every lens has a Minimum Focusing Distance. Sigma produces 2 macro lenses; the 105mm and the 150mm. Yours is not really a macro lens as, regardless of the focusing distance or if there indeed is a word "macro" printed on, the magnification is too low.
__________________
| Canong 480D mk II | EF 18-55mm LV mk XOXO marco + Bougainvillea-shaped hood |
parampita is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #6
ombre
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Yup, you need more magnification... the label macro on your lens is a little elusive. Simply states the minimum distance and magnification.

If you're on budget you can consider the Sigma 70-300. Goes for about 200, macros down to 1:2, some 230% closer than your current lens.

However I'm a little curious, does anything changes at the 210mm length? Macro is usually done at the long end... You're currently showing the markings for 70mm.
__________________
Jesus loves you! :)
ombre is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #7
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,296
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

It's simply because you can achieve a macro-like effect at full tele.
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 15th November 2008   #8
giantcanopy
Member
 
giantcanopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,965
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Macro is pretty loosely used in many of the commercial macro zooms, not too sure of their IQ but at best an auxillary feature and I would not get one just because of the "macro" function

The only true macro zoom I know of is Nikon's AF 70-180mm.

A macro prime lens is a better bet for macro work

Ryan
__________________
Kaleidoscopy & Singapore Shave!
Shaving Jedi
giantcanopy is offline  
Old 16th November 2008   #9
sherchoo
Member
 
sherchoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bukit Panjang
Posts: 502
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

I was fooled by the word 'macro' macro printed on my Sigma 70-300mm also. At 300mm the mag was 1:2 which I feel is still not macro enuff. So at 1:4.7 is not macro at all. To get proper macro, you'll need 1:1.

So far I'm not dissapointed with my Tamron 90mm which is 1:1. Great for most macro but a bit lacking if you need to take skittish insects.

My 2 cents worth.
__________________
|SonyA700|T180mmf3.5|M50mmf1.7|M70-210mmf4|S17-35mmf2.8-4|S30mmf1.4|T17-50mmf2.8|T90mmf2.8|M5600hsd|
sherchoo is offline  
Old 16th November 2008   #10
Galdor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Planet Gaia
Posts: 8,314
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Originally Posted by parampita View Post
Every lens has a Minimum Focusing Distance. Sigma produces 2 macro lenses; the 105mm and the 150mm. Yours is not really a macro lens as, regardless of the focusing distance or if there indeed is a word "macro" printed on, the magnification is too low.
There is a 70mm one also.
__________________
Good lens or Lousy lens also can't beat @ great photographer with kit lens - Galdor@Alphadslr
Galdor is offline  
Old 16th November 2008   #11
Leong23
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ming City
Posts: 2,805
Default Re: Macro, minimum focusing distance?

Originally Posted by ombre View Post
Yup, you need more magnification... the label macro on your lens is a little elusive. Simply states the minimum distance and magnification.

If you're on budget you can consider the Sigma 70-300. Goes for about 200, macros down to 1:2, some 230% closer than your current lens.

However I'm a little curious, does anything changes at the 210mm length? Macro is usually done at the long end... You're currently showing the markings for 70mm.
The so call "macro" is always done at the long end for all the zoom lenses with macro ability.

It is done by shifting the whole lens elements away from the sensor hence creating a void to enable the lens to focus nearer. Same theory of using an extension tube.
__________________
flickr
APAD 09
Leong23 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08950 seconds with 7 queries