Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

  1. #1

    Default Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Just wondering, because i keep seeing in the sub forums here that many people recommend newbies to start with their 18-55 kit, then add on a 55-200 to get a 18-200 zoom range.

    The question, therefore is ...
    DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A LONG RANGE?!



  2. #2
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    I have not shoot more than 105 focal length for very long time..., in fact, I shoot up 55mm most of the time.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  3. #3

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    I own lenses ranging from 10mm to 400mm. My telephoto lenses are always inside my dry cabinet, whereas, my 28-105mm is always on my camera. According to the EXIFs of my images, I use the range between 35mm and 85mm (35mm equivalent) range most.

    By the way, I shoot mainly landscapes, street and portraiture.
    Last edited by photobum; 14th November 2008 at 09:39 PM.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cowtown
    Posts
    1,343

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hedonistic View Post
    Just wondering, because i keep seeing in the sub forums here that many people recommend newbies to start with their 18-55 kit, then add on a 55-200 to get a 18-200 zoom range.

    The question, therefore is ...
    DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A LONG RANGE?!


    2 reasons:

    1) Convenience
    2) Safety (having a wide range covers all bases)

  5. #5
    Member terryansimon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Quahog, Rhode Island
    Posts
    95

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    I would like to have a range of lenses that cover 18 to 200 ≠ I need to have a range of lenses that cover 18 to 200.
    chicken fight!

  6. #6

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    No. it is up to the person's personal preference. my longest lens is 50mm.
    "If triangles had Gods, they would be three-sided"
    Flickr|

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    west side!
    Posts
    725

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    always good to have but differnt ppl different preferences la..
    i got lenses till 60mm and then jump to 300mm.
    the in-between dun interest me.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    I think it is usually the newbie who wants the all-in-one range of lens as a start.

    The sensible advices is then to get him to keep the kit lens, and get a 55-250mm IS IF he die die want to jump into a longer zoom early.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hedonistic View Post
    Just wondering, because i keep seeing in the sub forums here that many people recommend newbies to start with their 18-55 kit, then add on a 55-200 to get a 18-200 zoom range.

    The question, therefore is ...
    DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A LONG RANGE?!


    Bro, just get an 85mm 1.8 is enough if you are shooting portraits. You only buy what you need.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by EOS Revolution View Post
    No. it is up to the person's personal preference. my longest lens is 50mm.
    Yup, I totally agree with you.

    I only have one 50 1.8. lol
    D200/50 1.8

  11. #11

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    I feel kinda guilty, got more than 10 lenses to cover 12mm~300mm range, although I only use a 28-70mm zoom lens most the time

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    big tree town
    Posts
    2,389

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hedonistic View Post
    Just wondering, because i keep seeing in the sub forums here that many people recommend newbies to start with their 18-55 kit, then add on a 55-200 to get a 18-200 zoom range.

    The question, therefore is ...
    DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A LONG RANGE?!


    most newbies goes thru a period of self discovery. it usually takes some time b4 they know what focal length they usually use. no harm tele a bit. 18-200 (b4 crop factor) is the range that will cover most ppl use.

    I use 24-75 (b4 crop) 95% of the time.
    cameras are not made of tofu

  13. #13

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    it depends on the subjects you shoot

    for example, if your interest ranges from landscapes to butterfly photography.. then why not? i see no reason to begrudge anyone for getting what they need.. unless of course someone tells you to get 18-200 for the sake of having 18-200.

    then my question would be - WHY NOT 10-18MM?

  14. #14

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    How often do we shoot landscapes or butterflies? That is the question I will ask next.

    Of course, if the photographer is commissioned by NParks to record butterfly species, that's different story. For general use, however, I don't see the point of having a, say, 10-18mm lens.

    Again, we are talking about 'general' photography here.
    Last edited by photobum; 15th November 2008 at 08:36 AM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Nope... You don't have to.

    But it's good to have.
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

  16. #16

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Oh.... by the way. I enrolled into and graduated from RIT with just two lenses; a 28-70 and a 80-200. For macro assignments, I just added a bellow, a diopter or an extension tube. For landscape assignments, I loaned a 16mm from my lecturer. For sports assignments, I added a 2X converter to my telephoto zoom.
    Last edited by photobum; 15th November 2008 at 08:21 AM.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by photobum View Post
    How often do we shoot landscapes or butterflies? That is the question I will ask next.

    Of course, if the photographer is commissioned by NParks to record butterfly species, that's different story. For general use, however, I don't see the point of having a, say, 10-18mm lens.

    Again, we are talking about 'general' photography here.
    i shoot both leh

    and what's wrong with 10-20? to each his own.. i don't find the 20-50mm range very useful, but that's me.

    my point is - everyone has their own preferences.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by night86mare View Post
    my point is - everyone has their own preferences.
    That's when we have a bit of spare cash to purchase additional lenses lah....

    In my case for example, I started with a 50mm f1.4 on a 35mm film SLR. Then I added a 28-70mm and a 80-200mm, and stuck with these two lenses for 8 years.

    After I graduated and started working full-time, I added a 60mm macro.

    Then I wanted to go wider, so I bought a 17-35.

    Soon after, I wanted more refinement. I went back to prime lenses and bought a 25mm, 35mm, upgraded my 50mm, 58mm, 85mm and 105mm.

    I almost wanted to purchase a 10-20mm, but after much thinking, I decided not to as I know I will use it at all.

    Now, I stop buying lenses and channel my spending to other hobbies.
    Last edited by photobum; 15th November 2008 at 08:39 AM.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    floating in space.
    Posts
    795

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hedonistic View Post
    Just wondering, because i keep seeing in the sub forums here that many people recommend newbies to start with their 18-55 kit, then add on a 55-200 to get a 18-200 zoom range.

    The question, therefore is ...
    DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A LONG RANGE?!


    Depends on what you want to shoot lah.

    Really don't see the point of questions like this. Everyone has their own shooting style and range, so of course it depends on the individual.

    Is this concept that hard for people to understand?
    D∞X, 1-∞ mm F0.17. I like to show off my equipment list because I'm pro. My Flickr

  20. #20

    Default Re: Must you have a range of lenses that cover 18-200?

    The point is we can't ever tell what the other guy needs, so advising a newbie on the lens selection is a flawed approach in the first place.

    Especially when I think you guys would agree, the newbie can't be clear on what he wants to shoot, and list down everything - "I like to take macros, and portaits and landscapes and candids etc." .

    Having said that, it might not be easy for a newbie to decide what he really enjoys since he had not even tried out yet. So the advise to start with the kit lens is to me, the most sensible one.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •