![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 976
|
(Perhaps I should posted this in general discussion forum but I prefer the responses here.)
Say in terms of number of shots for screw-driven primes? Cos the diaphram stops-down and retracts back very fast every time u snap a picture - I see this as the main source of wear and tear, apart from the focusing ring.
__________________
Just a Pentaxian with his humble k10d... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Delta
Posts: 3,675
|
My Pentax K 85mm F1.8 has lasted 30 over years and still looks clean
__________________
Ricoh XR-P,Chinon CP-7m,Pentax Z-1SE/MZ-S/K20D+16-50mm F2.8+FA43mm F1.9 Limited,Metz 58 AF-1P |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 913
|
Not sure about the newer lenses, but the older ones seem to be built to last.
I have a M42 Pentacon 135mm.. the company ceased operations(?) in 1991, so even if mine's the last batch made (unlikely though!), it's already 17 years.. and working perfectly fine. ![]() A test shot with the lens (unprocessed except for resizing): ![]()
__________________
le petit photographe |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SengKang
Posts: 592
|
Agree, older metal lenses tend to last longer.
The plastic in newer ones (90s onwards) seem to be more brittle over time. I tried to take apart older lenses to clean, everything is metal inside and hardy. However the plasticky ones like those Vivitar 19-35s (even though Series 1)...the parts chip off very easily. I think to save on weight and perhaps cost, modern lenses are made less hardy. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|