12th November 2008, 09:39 AM
[Query]Random shooting in US.
Based on US legislature i think. Dont know how many points are valid in SG or other countries.
The top 10.
1. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though itís technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.
2. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, itís fair game.
3. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.
4. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.
5. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent) unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at the ATM? Not okay.
6. The following can almost always be photographed from public places, despite popular opinion:
* accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
* bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
* industrial facilities, Superfund sites
* public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
* children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
* UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris
7. Although ďsecurityĒ is often given as the reason somebody doesnít want you to take photos, itís rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a companyís trade secrets.
8. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)
9. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.
10. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you donít have to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers need a court order.
12th November 2008, 10:41 AM
Re: [Query]Random shooting in US.
Thanks for sharing. Americans are very into the freedom of speech and expression thingy, so that's why it is like that.
Actually in Singapore, the rule is even simpler. There's only ONE rule for everything and anything: You can do anything, but don't get caught...
Seriously, I think if you are taking photos as a hobby and as long as you do not use it for commercial or evil purposes, the chances are that you are safe. When photos are used for example, stock photos, then it get kinda grey. If you are really doing this as a business, do seek professional legal advice before you run foul of the law. Maybe some fellow CSers with legal background can give provide more specific advice on this matter.
. . . my Flickr here