![]() |
|
|||||||
| FAQs and Feedback Frequently Asked Questions are kept in here. You can also feedback on the site/forum and suggest new ideas. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguins
Posts: 5,131
|
larger, probably 120 x 120 and bigger file size limit > 40000bytes
I have tried very hard to squeeze this 5 frames gif movie into 20000bytes |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
My take: The bigger they get, the more annoying than helpful they become. However, I'll see what the rest of the team have to say.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
ClubSNAP Admin
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ClubSNAP Town
Posts: 1,794
|
I'm sure everyone prefer the server and web page to load and run faster. One of the way to optimise the server connections speed, is to have smaller Avatar size. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguins
Posts: 5,131
|
hmm..i dunno if it is possible....
but can we link the avatar from another web site? then won't slow down the server already |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
My take is to have a smaller Avatar. With the images being posted as big as 100K, having a 40K avatar does not quite make sense. The bandwidth can be used for the main content.
Regards CK |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguins
Posts: 5,131
|
also, can dun limit the maximum number of [img] tag in one post??
rite now we can only post 5 image at a time.... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
Maybe 6 then, at the most. Too many leads to super slow pages (even on cable).
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguins
Posts: 5,131
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|