Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: urban landscape

  1. #1
    Senior Member zhapchit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    North-East
    Posts
    693

    Default urban landscape

    urban landscape

  2. #2

    Default

    BOKEH!

    ok seriously.. hmm
    composition abit funny.... abit empty on the top (rule of the thirds?)

    there's no focus (not literally) on the subject... yea sure they are lots of em but maybe bokeh can not be applied.. rather composite the shot to show more detail of the subject or seamlessness.

    oh i must say the focused parts are pretty sharp (and detailed)
    Illumn|Facebook| Canon 5D Mark II | 16-35mm 2.8L | 24-70mm f2.8L | 85mm 1.8 | Strobist

  3. #3

    Default

    Nice angle!

    Would work better in B&W, though, especially since it's almost there already. The bit of green is distracting.

  4. #4

    Default

    Is there a thread tat explains the term "bokeh" ?
    One-North Explorers
    | Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but photos |

  5. #5
    Senior Member zhapchit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    North-East
    Posts
    693

    Default

    Thanks for the comments
    would try the B/W version later.

  6. #6
    Moderator ziploc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Snoopyland
    Posts
    4,577

    Default

    Originally posted by sbs99
    Is there a thread tat explains the term "bokeh" ?
    It's a japanese word meaning "blur". In photography it means the blurry background caused by shallow DOF.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    somewhere near...
    Posts
    2,114

    Default

    if you see probably...there's the focus the 4th and 5th section...hmmmmm

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •