19th June 2004, 11:22 PM
Originally Posted by jbma
i be gald to use my fisheye lens in front of him too! wanna see a big fat ase?
20th June 2004, 12:14 AM
Guess you all fell for it. He made this thread to gain attention and now we have helped him. Oh well, End of discussion.
20th June 2004, 03:07 AM
hmmm.. this mr big is BIG!! hahaha like william hung! hehehe, famous for all the wrong reasons!! no offence to william hung, dun wanna him to sue me or wat.
anyways according to the law,
Section 509, cap 224
Insulting the modesty of a woman
Whoever intending to insult the modesty of any women, utters anywords, makes sounds or gestures, or exhibit any objects, intending that such a word or sound shall be seen by the woman, or INTRUDES THE PRIVACY of such women, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year, or fine, or both.
technically,If the gals didnt know, it wouldnt be an offence.
unless dis so called "fat arse" subject do post the pics up in the internet
with or w/o alterations, and the girls find it offensive, they could put up a civil suit somehow. or if with alterations, could be defamatory in some way, that would stand in the suit too.
uz my $10.95 worth of thoughts.
20th June 2004, 03:39 AM
Intruding of privacy i believe in this case, is in places like toilets, changing room, or places where no cameras are allowed. It allows mean images of upskirts downblouse etc. There is an article some time back ago in the New Paper where this issue is discussed.
I guess taking photos of whoever is alright, just that if the image shows outrage of modesty, that is a different story, can sue the person for outrage of modesty resulting from action of candid shots, and not the action of taking candid shots per se.
20th June 2004, 08:35 AM
20th June 2004, 10:23 AM
Probably he did it just to show off to the girls, so that they can thank him. More of a busybody IMO.
23rd June 2004, 02:18 PM
23rd June 2004, 03:00 PM
wah this thread still alive ar...