![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,299
|
I'm wondering whether to invest in a 28mm or 40mm Limited - or to just bite the bullet and get something like a 18-50 f/2.8 zoom or 17-50 f/2.8 zoom from Sigma/Tamron.
I like the versatility of the latter, but I am quickly realising that size does matter - the smaller the better in this case. Anyone has any suggestions? I see a 28mm going in B&S .. And of course the 40mm is one of the cheaper Limiteds; but I'm wondering if 40mm is a tad too tight.Any suggestions and your experience will be appreciated, thanks! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 956
|
The 40mm is in fact very suitable for street. I used mine alot during my trip to Japan. It gets abit too tite indoor thou. I saw it going for as low as $250 in B&S.
__________________
Just a Pentaxian with his humble k10d... |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,299
|
it's 234 pounds here, i think i'll wait until summer.nah, i don't think i'll use it indoors.. do you have any photographs to show, so that i can gain a rough idea of the perspective? thanks so much for your reply! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 956
|
wow, thats exorbitant. Sure, I'll upload some pics tonight.
__________________
Just a Pentaxian with his humble k10d... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bt batok
Posts: 599
|
I love 43ltd for street photo...small. I can live with the noise it makes when focusing though.
![]() ![]() ...but kit lens will do too. ![]()
__________________
http://www.billitone.net/ Last edited by billitone; 4th November 2008 at 06:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bt batok
Posts: 599
|
one more with 43ltd
![]()
__________________
http://www.billitone.net/ |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,353
|
Welcome back bro.
I feel the DA 21mm makes a great lens for street shooting. The FA 28mm that is on B&S is also a good focal length to use. Both lenses are pretty compact and allow you to shoot up-close ala journalistic style. With Pentax you got so many primes that's good for street to choose from: DA 21mm Ltd FA*24mm FA 28mm FA 31mm Ltd FA 35mm DA* 35mm macro DA 40mm Ltd FA 43mm Ltd FA 50mm ... really it all depends on your choice of focal length that you're comfortable and familiar with.
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,299
|
thanks for all your replies..
![]() 43mm looks like quite a cool range, but i worry it is too tight. i am actually thinking of the 28mm f/2.8 which is on B&S but i'm not going to be back for quite a while! ![]() it is hard to find indeed, the 28mm f/2.8 with af.. :/ |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,158
|
You have the FA 50mm no? The 40mm and 43mm is still kinda close to that. For variety I'd say go for the 21-35mm range. You're great at handling wider fields of view anyway.
Just for reference, these are with a Sigma 30mm. Not suggesting the lens to you since it's not small. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Both East n West
Posts: 2,240
|
u looking for 1 lens solution ??
the 28mm f2.8 is pretty good and cheap... maybe u can ask the seller to keep for u till u are back... might work ![]() else 35mm f2 lor... also good and decent price but hard to find here though... actually what u have is ok liao... sigma + kit lens + 50mm...
__________________
~Towards Sublime Gallery~ |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 9,091
|
Your kit lens covers the focal range from 18mm to 55mm already, and it's pretty small especially if you don't put the hood on
But if you really want a faster prime lens for street photography, I think any of these will do: DA21, FA28, FA31, FA35, DA35, DA40, FA43 or even your FA50. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East
Posts: 1,950
|
28mm is a good choice. When I am using my 20-35, I find myself using that focal length a lot.
__________________
Pentaxian | apwp flickr Last edited by hjbyeo; 4th November 2008 at 09:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 311
|
personally, I will go with DA21 as my street walk around lens. The close focusing down to 20cm is really cool as you can easily do a close-up when you want. Yet its not tight like the 40to50mm range. 21 give you the general wide to at least cover the street, walkway, cover, etc.
Its small and light, and easily taken in and out of my bag during street walk. Another reason why I always has my DA21 on is because the focusing on this little limited is faster than my other FA lenses/zoom. cheerss.. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,299
|
these days london is poorly lit, overcast.. etc.. maybe that's why i'm toying with faster lenses.. ![]() i'll think about it - i was going through some of my streets and i realise that i use 28mm a lot actually. pretty bored and free around this time so the bbb (bored buy buy) syndrome possibly. gengh - thanks for the pictures, i was looking at the 30mm until i saw the size ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 9,091
|
I myself have used lenses from zooms, 21, 31, 43, 50, 135, 200 or even 300mm prime lenses for street photos. It all depends on your preference and the stuff you like to capture.
Some street candid shots by a FA43: http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243267 Some street people shots by K135/2.5 (yes, a manual lens): http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=302445 (some of those were taken by FA31) Travel street candid shots by Sigam DC1770: http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273964 I myself like people shots, that's why I prefer slightly longer lens for tighter shots. If I were capture street scenes, I'd go w/ DA21 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SengKang
Posts: 588
|
Sorry guys, I have a different view. I'd support the Tamron 17-50mm since it can cover all your street ranges as a walkabout lens. I still think wide-angles do have a place in street photog. With this lens, I think it may also replace your kit lens.
You can hit 24,28,35,40mm f/2.8 all from a single lens w/o needing to change. 40mm on a APS-C sensor is quite tight in my opinion, for street. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,353
|
I can vouch it is a very nice lens. You should grab it if you can find it as it is pretty hard to come by. Took me more than 6 months to hunt down one.
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: "River end"
Posts: 2,912
|
I use the 40/50mm mainly i'll shoot more people shots in street and I can maintain a friendly distance with them. If you shoot more of street scenes, probably you want to go wider.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,573
|
I had the DA21 for a while, but eventually decided to go with a 17-50 instead. Not as compact as the primes, but infinitely more versatile for my uses.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 675
|
I took some pics with DA 14mm f/2.8 ![]() ![]() The sky wavy tectures are results of image compression. Last edited by Ben Loke; 4th November 2008 at 10:38 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|