![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Side
Posts: 407
|
I'm taking motorbike sports race..
Currently using AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED. I didn't get enough zoom to capture far distance objects. I would like to know if AF VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED is it a good lens? What i know its not a fast lens.. but affordable.. unlike any other fast lens which is way beyond budget. any recommendation? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Singapore, east-ish
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() maybe a 80-200 + TC would be better? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Side
Posts: 407
|
wow.. ok!
80-200 but still cant get the close up zoom. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,976
|
The focusing might not be as snappy fast as AFS lenses, but optics wise should be a performer. The cheaper alternatives would be the old manual focusing lenses, or just rent a lens when you need to shoot.
Here is a review by users on FM forum Ryan Last edited by giantcanopy; 22nd October 2008 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Singapore, east-ish
Posts: 2,146
|
thats why i said pop on a TC
![]() a 1.4X Teleconvertor'll give you a 112-280mm lens @ f4 while a 2X teleconvertor'll give you a 140-400mm lens @ f5.6! oh course, TCs do degrade IQ but with a top-notch lens like the 80-200 and a decent TC, image quaility will still be reasonably good |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|