![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tessensohn
Posts: 18
|
Newbie here...I would like to ask for opinions or advise whether to change my 18-55 IS kit lens to tamron 17-50 F2.8 lens...been reading up the net recently and a lot of reviews say 17-50 is better. Anyway i have a sigma 10-20, tamron 28-75.... Sorry if this question has been asked before. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,313
|
Are you unhappy with the pictures that your 18-55 is giving you in terms of sharpness? No? Then no reason to change.
__________________
Alpha |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Workshop/Shoot Organiser
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Freezing Upp Thomson/Mandai!
Posts: 1,440
|
your other lens seems suffice but what are you shooting? Not necessary as 28-75 can do but then again, if you're going to shoot lotsa portraits and if you've spare moolah, why not
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tessensohn
Posts: 18
|
I would like to cover landscapes, portraits, indoor events... a bit of everything...and i do find my kit lens a little subpar on sharpness thus looking for replacements....by the way i also have one old 75-300 F4-5.6 lens...a gift from my fren...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Workshop/Shoot Organiser
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Freezing Upp Thomson/Mandai!
Posts: 1,440
|
Sounds a good enough reason to get it
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
|
May I share an experience as a newbie,
Almost all newbies want to shoot a little bit of landscape, portrait, street life, macro, event ect. And most of them (including me) find that the kit lens are not so fast, not so sharp, the color is not so good... But the sharpness depends on many factor, for a newbie, it is probably due to human factor, such as focus technique, handhold technique, sharpness setting, and post-processing. I used to think that my pictures not so sharp in comparison to that of some pro because I don't have expensive lens. End of the day, it turn out that they use Photoshop to enhance sharpness, there original photos also have so so sharpness and color. So what I suggest to you is keep using the kit lens first, research more on how to get a sharp photo, how to do post processing, and what kind of photography you want to shoot mainly. May be you also try to borrow the lens to shoot, and see if you can recognize the difference in sharpness. After all, if you are sure that it is the lens cause the lack of sharpness, then you change the lens. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
Good to have a fast lens like the 17-50 f2.8. Whether it's a must-have or not, depends on your shooting preference.
__________________
The best things in life are free. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: on earth
Posts: 417
|
it has f/2.8 constant hole..yes, but sharpness is not so much better. and it's noisy when focusing.. and there are bad copies out there.. if u are ok with your 28-75, why u wanna change? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|