![]() |
|
|||||||
| Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 246
|
Greetings to everyone,
I'll soon be getting my Olympus E420 and am wondering about what card to use with it? I understand that this camera only accepts Compact Flash Type II and xD-Picture cards and I'll be shooting mostly in RAW mode. As this is my first DSLR I'm not certain which card would be better to support RAW shooting, i.e. in terms of size, durability, writing speed, etc. Could someone please advise me which card to get and whether getting say, CF Extreme III or CF Extreme IV cards would make a difference? P.S: Can I confirm that Adobe Camera RAW supports Olympus E420? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bukit Batok, SG
Posts: 327
|
The last time I did an event (last Saturday, on my own leisure) I was using an xD card, and I was experimenting with RAW. I'm not sure whether this happens to everyone here, but my RAW file sizes are only between 8-10MB.
This config doesn't seem to be a problem, unless probably if you're doing continuous shots. I haven't tried shooting an event in RAW using my SanDisk Ultra II CF... (I actually forgot the CF card when I went to the event last Saturday) Last edited by mojims; 21st October 2008 at 10:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Singapore
Posts: 2,146
|
for me,I have both,but i prefer using CF card,I think a lot of ppl do being more stable and a lot faster than shooting with XD cards,CF cards,the high speed ones,really no diff I guess for normal shooting,if talking about high speed burst than i believe it does make a diff,lol
__________________
Olympus E-1 & E-3 |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hillview Ave, SG
Posts: 1,771
|
Definitely CF cards. I personally would not even touch a xD card.
Adobe Camera RAW do support E-420's RAW files.
__________________
Keneth Tan's Flickr! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SG, Clementi
Posts: 408
|
Please ask for the CF card. You can see the difference in transfer speed (performance) here
Normally, CF Ultra II cards can do up to 15MB/s read/write speed (varies from camera to camera) CF Extreme III cards can do up to 30MB/s read/write. CF Extreme IV/Ducati cards can do up to 45MB/s read/write (all values quoted here are with respect to Sandisk) I have both the Ultra II and Extreme III cards. Personally, I feel that the bottleneck in writing speed is not really with the CF card, it is more of the transfer speed from the camera to the CF card. I remember using my friend's D200 with the Sandisk Extreme III card and go trigger happy easily over at least 20 frames of RAW+JPEG (avg about 8+4MB) continuously whereas, I on the other hand was using my friend's E3 with the Sandisk Extreme III card and see E3 'buffer' (slowdown in shooting rate) after about 15 continuous frames of JPEGs (avg about 7MB per file) only. Of course, the point of interest here is that, I do not know how big an internal buffer does D200 have over the E3. As far as I feel, extreme III cards are more than sufficient for Oly dslr bodies. Hope this clarifies some of your questions.
__________________
Limitations Are Merely Excuses For Upgrading Camera Kits |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SG, Clementi
Posts: 408
|
To add on further on the transfer rate, you may want to take a glimpse here on the various CF card performance on the different bodies. Unfortunately, Olympus bodies are not benchmarked/listed...
But the point is, if you were to compare what you see on D200 vs D300 or D700 or D3 using the same card, the performance is different altogether. Of course, the good thing about getting a faster CF card is that, you're pretty sure that if the writing speed slows down, it is not because of your card but more of the limitation of the body/firmware.
__________________
Limitations Are Merely Excuses For Upgrading Camera Kits |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 453
|
to take advantage of the E3 transfer speed, you can consider the UDMA cards.
D200 does not support UDMA. check here for some tests and explanations. http://fourthirds-user.com/2007/07/h...ries_dslrs.php |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 453
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 453
|
to answer the TS question. def go for CF.
![]() go for the fastest CF if you shoot raw a lot. with reference from the E510 and E400 tested with 300x and 133x Lexar, there *should* be a marginal improvement over the writing speed. so it really depends on if you want to save time or money and also your shooting haibits. go for the UDMA if u plan to upgrade to E3 or cameras that supports it. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,460
|
Go for CF as it's much faster than xD...the only reasons to use xD is for extra memory without the need of swapping cards, or you want to use the panorama scene mode (in which case you would need an OLYMPUS branded xD card, any other brand of xD won't enable that feature).
I think the ExtremeIII card is still the fastest card for writing on E-xxx cameras, no one has reported that the ExtremeIV is any faster (although it will be faster reading through a high-speed card reader). Note that the UltraII cards will take twice as long to write an image than an ExtremeIII card; once you get used to the speed of a fast card, it's annoying to have to wait for a slower card to finish. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jurong
Posts: 2,251
|
CF card for me.
XD take years to transfer from card to PC.
__________________
Canon 7D + EFS10-22 + EF24-105L + Tamron 180 Macro + 580EXII + 10 Camera carrier |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 459
|
Is there any DSLR that comes with dual CF slots?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,986
|
The Nikon D3 comes with dual CF, not sure about the D700. But yes, there are...
__________________
Discuss and Share on Facebook |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 344
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,986
|
LOL! Zeiss is always a carrot!
__________________
Discuss and Share on Facebook |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,327
|
My recommendation for you is to buy the biggest and fastest CF card that u can afford and use it as the primary card to shoot. The XD card should be used as your backup. Do not ever discount the XD card. U will grow to enjoy the advantage of having 2 cards in your DSLR, albeit the XD will be slower than the CF.
__________________
E3, E620, 14-54 2.8-3.5 MkII, 50 2.0, 50-200 2.8-3.5 SWD |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
xD card? What is that?
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,460
|
I'll assume you're serious.
xD is one of the many types of memory cards out there, compact flash (CF), smartmedia, SD, MMC, memory stick, etc. xD is a format developed by Fuji and Olympus to replace Smartmedia. In the following image you'll see examples of the various cards, Smartmedia and xD in the rear, SD, memory stick, and memory stick pro in the middle, and CF in the front: ![]() Your camera has two memory slots in it, one for CF and one for xD, and you can have both filled at once. The rest of the page should make sense now. You can use one or the other, or copy from one to the other. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
To answer the title question:
Get both. I keep a 2GB type H in the xD slot all the time. I buy only 4GB CF cards, I have Extreme IV and Extreme III cards. The xD has saved my day more than once when I forgot the CF in my computer after downloading images from it. The slow write speed of the xD is not a big issue with the E-3 due to the large image buffer, but to download images from the card to the computer is really a PITA slow. My philosophy is that if you have two memory card slots, use both. Even if the xD is not often used, it comes handy at times, it costs practically nothing today if you buy Sandisk. With your camera the Pano mode is also available, which is even if not always perfect, but can be fun at times. I don't buy larger than 4GB CF cards because if something happens there are too many images lost. My camera can save about 240 raw images on the card and that is already a lot. Another advantage of having one card in each slot is that if the CF is full you can quickly switch to xD, quicker than changing CFs. Anyway, CF cards are faster and slightly cheaper, but because xD cards are also cheap there is no reason not to get one as well.
__________________
Welcome to my Blog: http://olyflyer.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|