Hi all, I'll to get some advice as to which would be a better lens..
I take mainly people and landscape in my travel.
Understand from some review that >200mm, the saturation is not good on the 55-250.
I'm in a dilemma cos I have a 17-50 tamron 2.8, so 18-200 will have duplicate focal length and its also more expensive than 55-250. If I get the 18-200, my feel is it'll be tempting to just keep the 18-200 on and the 17-50 becomes redundant..though I like the f2.8.
I'm however concerned about the optical quality of the 55-250. Main advantages are longer and cheaper.
These are my first sets of equipment, which I know eventually I'll have to upgrade in this lifelong passion I want to keep the budget low and learn as much before upgrading.
I tried to search the forum but couldn't find anything on this.
Thanks in advance!