![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bedok
Posts: 808
|
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/...p5-5p6_is_c16/
Very interesting... Check it out! Post you comments here... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 38
|
Is this lens better or should i get the 18-270 VC? Assuming both are the same price.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Changi, Singapore
Posts: 259
|
Tamron.
![]()
__________________
Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,445
|
I wish it is EF so i can mount it on 5D
![]() Saw good review and sample in POTN |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
Posts: 950
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,145
|
Review says the lens is mediocre at 18mm.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Punggol
Posts: 3,995
|
Super teles are always bad at either end- it's just that Canon's one is at 18mm. Sigma's and Tamron's weakness was at 200mm / 250mm.
__________________
Our pictures are our footprints. It’s the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 925
|
The distortion will give landscapers endless headaches as the "bow" that the distortion creates isn't exactly simple to correct.
see my samples from Vivo a while ago... |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|