Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: CanonVs.Nikon

  1. #1

    Default CanonVs.Nikon

    Hi, this is a classic question but I like to hear it out.

    I am considering macro and bird photography and looking into DSLR, possibly Nikon D90 or Canon 450D or 50D etc. I am considering the brand first as the latter buy would have to stick to the same brand direction

    I have not own any lense of the above but doing research before embark into any direction. Of course there are pro and cons for each but I like to hear it out from the forum before committed to the long "marriage" to any brand.

    Thanks a lot.

    Cheers,
    John E

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Punggol
    Posts
    5,782

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Canon vs Nikon

    If you're interested in bird photography, 50D (or 40D / 30D) + 400mm f/5.6L is the cheapest and longest reaching option. Nikon has no cheap alternative for long lenses (not that I know of).

    For macro, Nikon has a 105mm VR (vibration reduction) lens that allows to better handholding in less-than-ideal light for macro. However, Canon has a 100mm lens without IS (image stabilisation) that's cheaper. Macro should be done with tripod when and if possible, so a Benro / Yong Nuo tripod would be alright for you (as a beginner, unless you have deep pockets).

    For everything else you're going to shoot (family, events etc), both cameras (D90 / 50D) are good and both have good lenses. The 50D might be better on the ISO side, but its subjective.

    Canon has been dominating the high-iso low-noise sensor department for a while now (till the Nikon D3 / D300 came out). Their long lenses (perfect for birding and sports) have been the choice of many professionals for quite some time (Pre-2008 olympics, most of the lenses were white, which means they're Canon). Being the #1 brand for professionals for a while (1D2 and 1Ds2 was unbeatable for a while), Canon definitely seems to support their professional buyers more than the average hobbyist, with the Canon Professional Services (CPS) schemes and their awesome top-grade bodies, though their lower-end "perfect-for-hobbyists" models like the 450D and 50D do seem to be a good entry-point for newbies.

    Nikon, on the other hand, took the spotlight with their D3 and D300 models when Canon made a big blunder on their top-grade 1D mark3 autofocus. However, for the entry-level cameras, they really toned down the features. Nikon D40/D40x/D60 don't have AF modules in their cameras, for example. Other than the D3 / D700, the high-ISO pictures on every Nikon camera can't really match Canon's 40D / 50D, though the D300 and D90 sure are catching up very quickly now.

    For full-frame cameras, D3 has 12mp and 11fps full-frame shooting, while Canon's 1Ds mk3 has 21mp and 5fps shooting. To me (im probably wrong) Canon's full-frame seems to stress more on image quality than speed.

    Cheers,
    Zexun
    Last edited by Headshotzx; 5th October 2008 at 04:17 PM.
    Our pictures are our footprints. Itís the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr

  3. #3

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Since you already know about the pro and con of each brand, ok let's not make this into a battle between the brands. Make it a fun one.
    1 vote for Nikon since I'm using.
    All CS bros and sis let's vote and give this man a direction.

  4. #4

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    i vote for SONY ALPHA.
    by the way, 50D on the other side, nikon will be D300 sony will be A700
    so pls don't compare 50D to D90.
    i want to take great photos!!!

  5. #5

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Another countless Canikon thread!
    Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    bukit batok
    Posts
    1,478

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    1 vote to close thread.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Punggol
    Posts
    5,782

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by a.c.e View Post
    i vote for SONY ALPHA.
    by the way, 50D on the other side, nikon will be D300 sony will be A700
    so pls don't compare 50D to D90.
    Why is this? The D300 is a notch above the 50D with upgrade-able fps and when it came out, it used to cost 1k more than the 40D.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon_84 View Post
    1 vote to close thread.
    I don't see why a perfectly reasonable question would make you want the thread to be closed. The threadstarter clearly wants it to be an unbiased debate, and clearly there won't be a winner. It just needs to not start a flame war.
    Last edited by Headshotzx; 5th October 2008 at 04:22 PM.
    Our pictures are our footprints. Itís the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr

  8. #8

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by Headshotzx View Post



    I don't see why a perfectly reasonable question would make you want the thread to be closed. The threadstarter clearly wants it to be an unbiased debate, and clearly there won't be a winner. It just needs to not start a flame war.
    I sense sour grapes
    Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS

  9. #9

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by a.c.e View Post
    i vote for SONY ALPHA.
    by the way, 50D on the other side, nikon will be D300 sony will be A700
    so pls don't compare 50D to D90.
    The D90's IQ, function and features, low noise at High-ISO are all comparable to the 50D. D300 is way better than 50D - you shouldn't be comparing the 50D with the D300.

  10. #10

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Didn't know that this is a sensitive old issue.

    I scratched my head over weeks as newbie pondering over this question.

    Hope don't close the tread and hope to see some good advice.

    Thanks and cheers,

    John E

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lentor
    Posts
    507

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    There are countless of review articles on various models of C and N. Read them and evaluate the pros and cons yourself. Try them at shops or rent the cameras together with the lenses which meet your need to verify what you have read.

    I support closing the thread.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Punggol
    Posts
    5,782

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by eosdigital View Post
    I sense sour grapes
    You do? *shrugs* I'm no Ferrari president

    On topic, I feel that Nikon camera bodies well, FEEL better in my hands. But i'm used to Canon already.

    TS (threadstarter) should try out the Cameras at places like Cathay Photo / MS Color / John3:16 and see which one feels better in the hands. They can also advise you on which to purchase. Note that CP and best-denki / Courts / Harvey seem to always push the cameras that get them better commission, so watch out.
    Our pictures are our footprints. Itís the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr

  13. #13

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxton View Post
    The D90's IQ, function and features, low noise at High-ISO are all comparable to the 50D. D300 is way better than 50D - you shouldn't be comparing the 50D with the D300.
    There are no comparison....D300 price is way above 50D. Do research on the details that both camera can produce at the same ISO, especially at high ISO.

  14. #14

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by Headshotzx View Post
    You do? *shrugs* I'm no Ferrari president
    Spent some time pondering your reply, to see the message, but anyway, in case you get misunderstood, my sour grapes was referring to Simon who asked for the thread to be closed.
    Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS

  15. #15
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by Headshotzx View Post
    Why is this? The D300 is a notch above the 50D with upgrade-able fps and when it came out, it used to cost 1k more than the 40D.



    I don't see why a perfectly reasonable question would make you want the thread to be closed. The threadstarter clearly wants it to be an unbiased debate, and clearly there won't be a winner. It just needs to not start a flame war.
    There won't be no unbiased debates on this subject, soon or later, it will become a flame war no matter what anyway.

    To TS:

    go and do a search on macro and bird photography, you will see photographers using all sorts of cameras. there is no such thing as which cameras is better, most of the time, is only the photographers make the camera looks bad.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    1.45N 103.83E
    Posts
    3,202

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Its really more on the skill of the man behind the camera. Here are some recent shots on the 2 subjects TS mentioned. Knowing my system let me take better photo. To me both C & N are good.


    Bird shot today




    Macro shot 2 months ago


  17. #17

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    For bird photography, first look at lens availability then ask which system. Without the appropriate lens, you can have 1D/D3 and you still cannot get a good bird shot.

    Have you considered what lens you need and how much is their respective price?

    Do you want to shoot birds-in-flight? Then you need to ask around for the respective lenses AF speed (that has nothing to do with the cam's AF speed).
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  18. #18

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Good point to consider.

    I am looking at 100mm macro lense or equivalent and also a 400 zoom. Any recommendation or comments.

  19. #19

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Fab shots...this is what inspired me to take up macro and bird photography..Thanks for sharing

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    1.45N 103.83E
    Posts
    3,202

    Default Re: CanonVs.Nikon

    Minimum for birding is 400mm and believe me, you will never have enough reach even if you have 800mm. Ideally 600mm f4 is a good birding lens. You can start with canon 400f5.6L if you choose Canon system. Nikon's birding lens are more expensive but alternative 3rd party like Sigma are cheaper. Beside body and lens, you will need good tripod and Gimbal head. The last 2 items is the most important for a birder's setup.

    For macro, cheap and good is the tamron 90mm. My shot above is by that lens with a 25mm tube.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •