![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 154
|
I've developed about 3 rolls of lucky shd and i'm still struggling to find the best development time and dilution to bring out more contrast. I'm using HC110 tried with 1:100 12 mins and 1:31 4 mins. Both turned out quite flat. Any suggestions?
heres a sample ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 702
|
use less water ( not so diluted ) or extend your dev time or agitate more vigourously
or combination of all 3 thats the print right ? must see negative to give more constructive advice : ) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,309
|
Exposure plays a key role too. U might want to look into this as well.
Burn another few rolls and try to write everything on a notebook or paper. Try other developer like D-76, Rodinal, Diafine and etc... I am using HC-110 too. Just order some Rodinal to try.. I seen some Flickr pictures on Lucky with Rodinal! Very nice combo. I haven't try it yet so i cant tell you much. Will update again.. Good luck and have fun.. ... |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 154
|
thanks for all the replies. the pic is actually a scan, not a print..
I just might try Rodinal, where can i get it? Ruby? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Excelsior S.C #02-25
Posts: 2,371
|
You might want to try putting a yellow filter on your lens when you shoot outdoors.
Alternatively, do some post processing, like adjusting the levels to recover the flatness. It could be due to the scanning part. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sembawang
Posts: 3,725
|
I think using a colour will help..
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|