![]() |
|
|||||||
| Consumers Corner Want to find out or give info on where, how much, how good, what to buy? Here is where you should be. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 820
|
What kind of canon lenses will you need for taking wedding day photos.
NOT THOSE FANCY POSES ONE But ..... Church Ceremony Tea Reception Dinner at hotel Any techinical tips like filters, f-stop, shutter etc to use ? Thanxs guys. ![]() Using 10D + 550 EX 70-300 4/5.6 IS USM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toa Payoh
Posts: 187
|
Bro, your lens seems too long for such events. Bring along a wide angle and a second body. Lots of batts for baody and flash too. Dress in Black. That's what my church photog does
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 820
|
what is the recommended lense leh ??
WHy dress in black ? later I kena chased out by the brides mother .. black=bad luck ... kekek |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
BTW, it's 75-300, right? Not 70-300.
75x1.6 is 120. Personally, i think it's way to long; esp for the tea ceremony. You've got to shoot from the neighboring block to get the whole scene in. (Anyway, it's usually crowded during the tea ceremony. Step back a bit, and some aunty/uncle will block the view.) If you're on a budget, try the 3rd party 19-35 (<$400). If you're financially sounder, try the 16-35 (~$2.2k), the 17-40 (~$1.2k) or the Sigma 14mm (~$1.2k). The 15/2.8 fisheye can be a good wide angle alternative too, coming in at ~$1k for the Canon one. A 50/1.4 is great too; try it at f1.8, ISO800. Should be able to get great available light candids of couple and friends at wedding reception. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ToFusland
Posts: 5,563
|
75-300?
Can shoot the wedding ring... Myoplex, you'll need 1 wide angle like what st1100 mentioned. The 17-40 is a good start. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 820
|
![]() "A 50/1.4 is great too; try it at f1.8, ISO800. Should be able to get great available light candids of couple and friends at wedding reception" such a high ISO recommended ? would it have alot of noise ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
We work to different standards. At the end of the day, you have to deliver what is considered acceptable to yourself. Do a test print at the size you intend to deliver and decide if you can accept the noise at ISO800. For me, 800 is the limit; 1600 and 3200 are 'just for fun', i've never blown up any print shot at those sensitivities. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kitten's Den
Posts: 733
|
I remember using the Fuji 800 flim with no significant grain. (the profession version, not the consumer one) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eunos
Posts: 123
|
I will prefer a Wide-Angle lens (ie.17-40L) for the tea reception and Dinner (table-to-table shots). This is esp so with the 1.6x multiplier for the 10D.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East
Posts: 689
|
I would propose to use a 24-135 such as Tamron as a general purpose lense. Try and beg, borrow or steal a 2.8 80-200 lense for the dinner shoot that you may want to capture the ambience without using flash, especially when they are on stage yum-senging!
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
Canon L lens will do the job....
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 2,149
|
I'll be having my first official wedding shoot end of the month, and I'm planning to bring the following:
1) Canon 17-40mm F4: for group wide angle shots, half-body shots, wide-angle closeups 2) Tamron 24-135mm F3.5-5.6: general purpose lens, also to provide telephoto reach lacking frm 17-40mm 3) Canon 50mm F1.8: contingency lens for low-light situations I'll foresee myself to move quite a lot so I won't be carrying the 70-200 f2.8, which is too heavy and bulky. I'll also foresee lenses (1) and (2) to fulfill almost all my needs already, thus minimising on lens changing. But this is coming from someone who hasn't officially taken wedding photos before, so just use it as a rough reference. If this one works out successfully, I'll use it for another wedding shoot at the end of the year. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 2,149
|
I forgot to mention the above are to be used on a DSLR body. So effective focal length covered is 28-200mm, enough for a wedding.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|