Looks like no one here has heard of the FHM case....did it even exist?
I get paid more shooting part time ...... damn, I should find more time to shoot part time
AFAIK ... the FHM model incident did occur ... But i think that should be laid to rest ....
Now a more recent case would be of course the famous HK actor - Edison Chen and all his slew of girlfriends ....
On a further dig ... i think the person who put the advert in sammyboy should be quite familiar with CS ....
Here are 2 photos of his models for some of his other lingerie shoots ...
#1 - Angela (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3187/...c3f89193cc.jpg)
#2 - (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3120/...67c08d4f82.jpg) no names were mentioned ... but I believe some of the photogs here may know who she is ...
We can refer to the FHM girl case as an example but best not to drag names in. There is no need to force out the names of the people involved. Just take it as a general example. Even if we take away that issue from consideration, we can still discuss about having guidelines for organisers to follow.
Since there's so much doubt on the existence of the FHM case, then lets just leave it out as suggested, and not use that as an example to bolster any points. Besides, whatever is done in that case, if really occured, has nothing to do with the forum administrators or how the forum is run.
all i have to say is why is this an issue being raised with the forumers when its quite obvious ts should be engaging the admin and mods directly?
Opinions are like A-holes. Everyone's got one.
Good point, no idea.
why all this drumming on one example? got nothing else substantial or of substance to offer? it is obviously a logical fallacy to paint things over-simplistically by representing the fhm example as the one and sole thing holding up the whole concept that threadstarter is talking about. ludicrous to say, oh, fhm example not valid, let's find another thing that works or threadstarter's point is thrown out of the window.
so if i make a statement that i felt a raindrop around the corner, are you going to say that it absolutely won't rain because my head isn't even wet?
see the other thread. if "community at large" probably refers to the majority of people who actually participate in the sleazy-themed photoshoots.. then the point is conceded. otherwise, i see no reason why the organisers have to resort to such methods. modelinn has very innocent, down-to-earth names, for an example, and i hate to say this, but it seems that you also get what you pay for.
Last edited by night86mare; 3rd October 2008 at 06:14 AM.
This additional thread below can probably serve as a concurrent discussion on this topic for guidelines and standards for shoot organisers.
Seems like the guy strikes again.
If you PM him, then you will get an email containing the "models" details".Here is the email i got from him
What is your name & h/p contact for details & confirmation?
--- On Tue, 21/10/08, Ed Services <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: Ed Services <email@example.com>
Subject: New Australian Lingerie Model Limited Period Only - now till 27 Oct
New Australian Lingerie Model Limited Period Only
$200/hr for 1 to 1 excluding place. If include make-up artist and room/studio separate charge applies.
Or special promotion :
Sat 25 Oct - 3pm-5pm 2 hrs
Sun 26 Oct - 9am-11am 2 hrs
Location in a five star hotel in town. Up to 4 or 5 pax per session.
Cost $120 per pax including refreshment & hotel room.
Ed-Services. Anyone rings a bell ? Don't ask me what im doing in that forum, i just happened to "drop by"
Yup, anyone got her contact ? I mean, she is being advertised as a nude model in there. Kinda sad to see someone is doing this kind of thing.
Last edited by TheQuestion; 23rd October 2008 at 12:21 AM.
Opinions are like A-holes. Everyone's got one.
Seems like there's a lot of stories going on about Ed-Services that I've been hearing going around.
I found this as well regarding cody richards. Think she better be becareful with who she worked with
GWCs oso must be careful of XMMs cry wolf. anybody can spin a story, that's why its locked. is she such an innocent XMM? fly here do sexy shoot?
some things cut both ways. if really want to be safe employ female security guard to be present loh.
If anyone goes to the "Services Wanted Section" to take a look ... there is a new member (Post Count = 1) almost every otherday looking for nude/lingerie model for private shoot .... What does that say about CS? Have we become a sourcing ground for nude model / lingerie and bikini XMM ?
These are brand spanking new members ... they may not be new to photography or they may have a damn impressive portfolio that they do not want to show here ... But i seem to smell something fishy ...