ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 30th March 2002   #1
Megadark
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default B&W or Colour?

Many years ago, black and white was the norm and colour photos were non-existent. Then came colours and many celebrated. In this time, there are many who revert back to B&W in their picts for a "different" look.

Why use B&W when there are colours? Wouldn't colours be more exciting in a picture? What is the purpose of photographers who take B&W photos rather than coloured ones when they can do so?

Please share you ideas. Thank you.
 
Old 30th March 2002   #2
ckiang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
Default Re: B&W or Colour?

Quote:
Originally posted by Megadark
Many years ago, black and white was the norm and colour photos were non-existent. Then came colours and many celebrated. In this time, there are many who revert back to B&W in their picts for a "different" look.

Why use B&W when there are colours? Wouldn't colours be more exciting in a picture? What is the purpose of photographers who take B&W photos rather than coloured ones when they can do so?

Please share you ideas. Thank you.
In B&W, you focus on the emotion, the form, the mood, etc of the pic, without letting potentially distracting colours come into play. Without such distracting elements, the viewer will automatically be led to focus on the said aspects.

Of course, not everything is suitable to be rendered in B&W; likewise, not everything is suitable to be shot in colour.

Regards
CK
ckiang is offline  
Old 31st March 2002   #3
Megadark
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank you CK. Can you show me some illustrations? Your help is very much appreciated.
 
Sponsored Link
Old 3rd April 2002   #4
eadwine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: east side
Posts: 1,954
Default

personal opinion...
i think black and white photos are nicer then coloured ones...
cos it gives u more imagination...errmm get what i mean.?
eadwine is offline  
Old 3rd April 2002   #5
ckiang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Megadark
Thank you CK. Can you show me some illustrations? Your help is very much appreciated.
I don't really have any illustrations as I've not done B&W for ages already.

Regards
CK
ckiang is offline  
Old 3rd April 2002   #6
StreetShooter
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katong
Posts: 4,702
Default

Thanks for the links. I especially enjoyed photosbykathryn.

Basically the argument for black and white, as mentioned earlier, is to remove distractions caused by colours, so that you focus on the human emotion.

I honestly can't therefore understand B&W nature and landscape photography, except that it reduces shapes and forms to abstractions, purifying them. Many times, what you see in nature isn't perfect. Colours may be blotchy or distracting. Leaves have brown edges, rock surfaces have flaws. Reducing them to B&W brings the images nearer to perfection, by removing these imperfections, I guess.

Technically speaking, B&W offers many attractions. No need to worry about colour rendition or white balance. Decreased dynamic range usually makes a picture more attractive, not less so, by more clearly defining the subject. Noise is a plus, not a minus, since the grainy effect is sought by many.
StreetShooter is offline  
Old 4th April 2002   #7
siron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere near...
Posts: 2,123
Default

Depends on each's liking...some pic look nicer in B&W...
siron is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.06638 seconds with 7 queries