![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
Yes, one of the countless threads regarding this topic.
Just got my new lens yesterday, and tested for focus accuracy today. Is the results acceptable? There seems to be a little back focus biasness in both tele and wide end. ![]() ![]() If this is completely unacceptable, i can sent in to CSC but very troublesome and hassle-some. Thank goodness there's FTM so i can adjust minor focus during shooting
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
More test shots
![]() ![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,388
|
the black focus line didnt appear in focus in the first place.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
Hello, are you referrring to the rear black bar to the Focus Bar?
In my tests, i was looking at the millimeters description to the left and right of the focus bar. My assumption of slight back focus biasness was because the 2,6 and partly 10mm after the Bar was more sharp than the one below it. Am i wrong to assume that, and in this case this is normal focusing radius?
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 1,403
|
try shooting the real world.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
Yup i know that. But im wary of this problem and want to confirm if it's one because i do not want to go out shooting one day and find out after that most of the shots are OOF or Minor OOF because of this issue
![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,576
|
What lens are you testing here? Looks to me that your aperture is not set to maximum opening. Not sure about the angle (seems a bit steep) and if you are at minimum focusing distance.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
Aperture is wide open at F/4. Lens is the 17-40mm f/4 L USM ![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
BTW, it's not MTF (that's resolution charts), it's MFD (minimum focusing distance). As an aside, why not just shoot some stuff in the real world today as a test? At least it's a non-critical application. Last edited by calebk; 18th August 2008 at 11:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,263
|
Try shooting outdoors. Like some subjects or flowers. You can get a rough gauge. From what i see it's not that bad, but back focus is a little off. Sometimes, lens don't work well on paper based tests, try real life subjects with more light.
gman |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 319
|
is your cam mounted EXACTLY 45 degrees when you shoot the chart?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
if you want to do the test, at least use a tripod lar,
and also get your exposure right too. btw, you only tested on the 17mm, how about other focal length? anyway, since the dof is 1/3 at the front and 2/3 at the back of the focusing point, so the test seem rather OK to me, don't forget, even you have a very sharp lens with no front or back focus issue, in a real world application, many time can't even get sharp focus due to user problems, so unless your really really think your lens have some issues, else doing the test it is not necessary. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
But thanks for the advise anyway
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|