![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
hello CSers.
shot this during NDP but at Padang. ![]() been wanting to know how you guys feel about the -composition -post processing -the feeling it gave and any other comments. i understand that there are noise, but i can't seem to reduce them. any suggestions? ![]() Last edited by HTCahHTC; 13th August 2008 at 11:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
due to post processing i think.
seriously, i didnt even noticed that... thanks... |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 577
|
aha you look at that picture and all you see is the white dot??
there are quite obvious lines around the buildings tho. but shouldnt be a problem, good picture, well done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in Critterdom
Posts: 410
|
the composition is not bad... but do take note that there's quite alot of noise in the picture.... the trees at the side look a shade of under exposed green and the buildings look very unnatural against the sky as it seems to have a odd kind of outline on it... the red neon lights on the building look over saturated hence becoming a distraction...
what kind of settings did you take with? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,714
|
Frankly, seems pretty badly post-processed to me. The buildings etc seemed to be pasted on ... unless my eyes are failing me.
__________________
fuzzyeyeballs |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
The critique, why so nitpicky? It really doesn't take away anything from the photo.
![]() --- It's a really great idea, and your composition is really spot on for this. However, the post-processing lets it down though. Was this a HDR rendered from a single RAW file? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
|
Nice job on the composition and timing of the shot....
But as mentioned, work needs to be done or less done up... Try Noise Ninja as you're shooting with ISO 800, it's a major requirement. And since you're shooting with 18mm angle of view, you can open up a lil more |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 658
|
Composition-wise, I think it's good. Last edited by Zeddy; 14th August 2008 at 08:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 242
|
yup i agree with the good framing but the pp can be improved further
![]()
__________________
Let there be Light. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
thanks for all the replies xD
gee... sorry i 'spoilt' your eyes ![]() i thought the post processing worked -.- LOL. i think too much. nope, not HDR. i merely played with Levels in photoshop. xD i checked out Noise Ninja and it sure is expensive. wa. i didnt know EXIF data will be included when saving the image ![]() ![]() thanks btw. how to improve pp? ![]() enlighten me pls... |
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
but thanks for viewing! ![]()
yeah, i did notice. guess it was becos of post processing and shooting at ISO 800. taken note of all the mistakes you have highlighted. and settings are... -F/8 -1/125 sec -ISO 800 -Spot Metering -Aperture Priority
![]() but thanks for viewing and complimenting ![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,262
|
do you have the original picture?
color palette is gruesome (i do not mean that offensively, it just gives a gruesome feel), the composition is something i like and the tilt seems to actually work here. but yes, as everyone else has commented, processing has given it an overdone, mutated feel.. which is a pity. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
um, yeah.
i'll upload the original pic later ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
here's the original.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,262
|
![]() my try; i think you really went very heavy on the post processing - here i used layers, one layer set to screen type, one layer set to multiply, keep multiply for sky, slowly erase with soft brush some contrast/color/exposure adjustments best case scenario is if you had used fill flash on the kid. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
hmmmm...
okokok. looked so much better than original and my post processing ![]() thanks alot dude! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 819
|
GEEZ!
i can't seem to get near to the results night86mare did. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|