![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: kazeeee.com
Posts: 294
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Picture, on the whole looks fine.
Some nitpicking though - I think it would have been stronger if the camera was centered on the travelator. The horizon's also tilted. All these things will add up to getting a stronger image. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,533
|
good shot. Too balanced. Maybe less foreground and more light streaks too.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: funky town!
Posts: 1,328
|
im always a fan of such photos, where by strong lines and bright colors lead to the center of the frame. however as caleb has mentioned, the horizon is slightly tilted, take note next time!
![]() good shot still. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: thomson there
Posts: 371
|
very nice i like this.
of course you could always do better next time but this is awesome! just a thought. would it be cooler with a different colour scheme and some acid contrast? haha |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 197
|
try to slant the horizon more...for a different perspective.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: kazeeee.com
Posts: 294
|
Thanks everyone for the comment, I'll try to improve from that =)
btw this was taken at Changi Airport MRT, the travelator which connects T3 and T2 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,307
|
good idea, bad execution - you want symmetry here but the symmetry is not there becaues of technical errors.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: kazeeee.com
Posts: 294
|
thanks, ok noted of that. =)
maybe perhaps I should just shift the vanishing point out of center? |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
It's easier to get the horizon straight than it is to shift the vanishing point out of the center without screwing up your horizons.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 541
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Would you even feel proud of doing that?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 541
|
eeeeer, i dunno. such is moral question. not taking sides, but hard to draw the line. eg, if i deliderately exclude a lamp-post/dust bin to create a impression of prestine wilderness, is it considered cheating? like wat NGC "Genius of Photography" (approximately) says," ... ...photography is a unpredicatable medium that immediately transforms a scene... ..." |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
I would hesitate to call the piece 'photography' if it is essentially cloning one of the halves in order to get it symmetrical. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,307
|
for me, there is nothing wrong with doing that,
but only when extreme, extreme symmetry is needed and there is no real way to produce it irl |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: kazeeee.com
Posts: 294
|
i went back to try and realised that the travelator is not at the center, between the lights kinda hard to make the simetrical effect.
![]() anyway thanks for the comments |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|