![]() |
|
|||||||
| Sigma/Tamron/Tokina 3rd party lenses/flashes and accessories from Sigma, Tamron and Tokina. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 658
|
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses...lens-test.html
The review for Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM is out. Seems like it's a pretty good lens. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore - Telok Blangah Rise
Posts: 143
|
I Love this Lens!! Very rare to get so cheap $1.4k and 400mm at F5.6!! RAWL!!
Buying this lens next month... I hope to get a 2nd hand from here!! If not get 1st hand lurhh ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SG
Posts: 212
|
I have this lens! Use it mainly for planespotting, esp. military jets.
Some of my shots taken with this lens. http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=6751...0-400mm&m=text
__________________
My flickr photos |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 705
|
anyone have both and can compare the 120-400 vs the 150-500? Will be using it for sports, birding, airshows and moon shooting. I kinda like the 120-400 using a 77mm filter so i dont have to buy another set of filters unlike the 150-500 using 86mm. But i am also afraid i might regret not having that extra 100mm. What a dilema.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore - Telok Blangah Rise
Posts: 143
|
If you dun use full frame camera and use APS-C, your 400mm = 640MM already.. No point getting 500mm(800mm). __MM x 1.6 The picture quality that comes out from 150-500mm is very bad.. Best to get 120-400mm. I am getting 120-400mm soon!! for my indoor shooting and outdoor sporting events =) Remember one thing, 150-500mm is very heavy, need a tripod. 120-400mm can be handheld. Its also heavy, but Aperture is big enough. Anyway if you wan try try 150-500mm, get a 2nd hand.. Peninsula Shopping Centre got sell.. The 2nd hand shop Ben Photo, outside the food court derh.. Canon Mount and Nikon Mount also have =)) $950 only.. hahax.. 150-500mm is mainly for outdoor sports like soccer, while 120-400mm is for both indoor and outdoor. =)) Last edited by ProMushr00m; 13th August 2008 at 07:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
It's very likely that you think the image quality is bad (or very bad, as you strongly put it) because of subject movement or camera shake. I suggest you get your facts right before you write so strongly. First off, the 150-500 has HSM. Secondly, the 120-400 is not much of a better lens indoors than the 150-500. I don't get why you say the 120-400 has a big enough aperture though it's only faster by 1/3 stop at best. Like that is going to make a huge difference. Indoors, f/5.6 is also no go for sports, unless you are on a D3 or 1D MkIII and your ISO goes all the way up. Even so, that's kind of pushing it. You'd be looking elsewhere for an indoor lens, definitely NOT in the 120-400. For crying out loud, it's a f/4.5-5.6 lens! I have a constant f/4 lens in the Sigma 100-300, and that's not even enough in most indoor lighting. It's ridiculous to say the 120-400 will perform indoors where the 150-500 cannot. Last edited by calebk; 13th August 2008 at 08:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 705
|
chill guys..i am still considering between the 120-400mm and 150-500mm with HSM OS. Using a D40 body but prolly getting either a D300 or D90 with the 120-400 or 150-500mm together. Guess i will wait for more reviews and maybe have a feel of both lenses before making my decision.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
slrgear have a review on the 120-400, sadly they didn't test the 150-500, i find their review pretty accurate (provided they didn't get a lemon copy), in this case the 120-400 weakness seems to be at the 300-400mm softness wide open.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Catchment Area
Posts: 2,423
|
Now, how about comparing these 3 lenses:
120-400 F4.5-5.6 100-300 F4 50-500 F4.5-6.3 300 F4 is pretty easy to hand hold and shoot and then crop to get to 400-500. 500 F6.3 is already less easy to shoot due to the smaller aperture, AF hunting. Also, need tripod and more difficult to hold steady, need one stop faster shutter speed. Theoretically, comparing the 2 results, the PQ for the latter is better, but in practice, due to the difficulties, it is the 300 F4 that gets the shots. I am using the Sg100-300 F4. And I have the 1.4xTC. I find that I am better off most of the time without the TC and crop to get to 400/420. You may wish to read this User Report on the Sg100-300F4 : http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=200389
__________________
I love big car, big house, big lenses, but small apertures. Last edited by smallaperture; 14th August 2008 at 10:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Simei
Posts: 227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
May you have the best photos shooting with your 120-400mm indoors. I am also a user of the 100-300 f/4 that smallaperture is using. Great lens, but indoors, barely usable. I sincerely wonder what kind of indoor events have such specialised light for f/5.6 to be enough but not f/6.3. Last edited by calebk; 14th August 2008 at 10:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Catchment Area
Posts: 2,423
|
BTW, calebk, going for the RSAF open house end of this month?
__________________
I love big car, big house, big lenses, but small apertures. Last edited by smallaperture; 15th August 2008 at 11:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Haha. Don't know man...it's been awhile since I've taken the 100-300 for a run. I might. You gonna be there ah?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 314
|
Get your facts really right first before u write alot. First off, the 150 - 500 has much difference when u are shooting birds from 400mm. The little 100mm does alot of difference. Try it out first before u write down that it does not have much difference. I presume you have not tried shooting birds yet. 2ndly the 120-400mm is not even for indoor usage. Seem like u are just a beginner or something. Again u should try it out in indoors first and see if u can get freezing shots before you conclude that it can be used indoor. 3rdly the 1 at penin at 950 is 50-500, not 150-500mm. That 1 has no DG if i am not wrong. The 1 with DG equipped is 1k +. Do take note of minor difference again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jalan Poonpipi
Posts: 446
|
![]()
__________________
The more I shoot, the luckier I am in getting the good ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 658
|
There is. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/rsaf/oh08/
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SG
Posts: 212
|
From http://www.mindef.gov.sg/rsaf/oh08/info/security.html
Cameras are allowed, but please note that telephoto lenses that are 500mm and beyond are prohibited. So the 120-400mm will be allowed, but the 150-500mm will not be?
__________________
My flickr photos |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bukit Batok
Posts: 252
|
I think what they mean is those massive prime lenses?
Experienced ppl pls correct me if i'm wrong.. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|