![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
|
i was using a 18-70mm nikon with my d70 and i am looking for and upgrade to a zoom lens around that focal length what would be reccommended? any help would be appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Former CS Senior Member
Posts: 3,067
|
70-300.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
|
no as in around that type of lens not really zoom as in around 18mm+/- to 70mm+/-
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
AFS 17~55f2.8, if you really really really consider upgrading
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 881
|
You also have the 16-85vr, 18-200vr, both from nikon.
If you want to consider 3rd party, you can try 17-50 f2.8 tamron.
__________________
Dun blame the camera...blame the one behind the viewfinder :bsmilie: My Flickr..pls leave comments! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Singapore, east-ish
Posts: 2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Astin Studio
Posts: 4,724
|
I suggest the 16-85 VR, it has the similar size and zoom range, and VR too.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: big tree town
Posts: 1,653
|
Besides those mentioned, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, Tamron 28-75 F2.8 are gd third party zooms.
__________________
cameras are not made of tofu |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 320
|
Well, high end or low end? I would recommend 24-70 f/2.8 or 24-85 f/2.8-4 or perhaps 17-55 f/2.8 All pretty high end lenses though, and good of course.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 224
|
For event such as wedding, with lots of movement, I will recommend 17-55 F2.8.
For Landscape, 16-85 VR a good and cheaper option.
__________________
http://www.fullframejournal.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 118
|
i reckon nikon 18-200 VR .... excellent work around camera but take note, its quite heavy..... now i'm really tempted to get tamron 17-50....
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
If not, you'll be upgrading for the sake of upgrading. You upgrade your lens to meet a need, not out of a whim or fancy (well, unless you have money to burn). |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
|
i want sharper pictures and brighter colours
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
it comes with a nice price tag, and heavy too.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|