![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CCK
Posts: 285
|
"Nikon D700 is just a distraction, the real surprise is still to come"
Nikon modular camera with insert type interchangeable sensor coming this September? ![]() http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/ni...l-to-come.aspx |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,466
|
Yes modular system is already in the medium format system like the phase one and leaf. The 35mm camera manufacturer will have their prototypes or vapour wares in their R&D and road map. But not in the immediate future. Nonsense at this stage. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Simei, Punggol Central
Posts: 824
|
I am not surprise. Technology always surprise us with what it can do. Maybe when film become extinct. You will see Kodak selling CCD or CMOS sensor off the rack.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
reminds me of a PC concept back in the 386 days where it CPU was on one of the card slots that offered upgrade path by just changing the cards.
Apparently, the concept was cool...except that not only the CPU was evolving but the whole system was also changing. Can already see quite similar trends in the MF cams, not only the sensor changes but also the body are evolving.
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CCK
Posts: 285
|
would be good if we have a option to switch the sensor to fujifilm super CCD or sigma fovenon sensor, just like the digital back in MF.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
... although personally I think it was the specific camera system rather than the modularity that killed the idea in this case... with a stronger/more popular camera system, and a built from scratch body rather than adding a digital capture component to a film camera so that communication between systems and electronics of the various parts can function as well as modern integrated DSLRs, don't see why it would not be possible in the coming days... say Photokina (maybe just an announcement if not a prototype) ![]() as for changing the sensor, it would probably be within a particular company's own available set of sensors, so probably no pick and choose cause the chip would still have to have supporting electronics... I don't see anyone going for an open format for a module cause the digital module is gonna be the main money spinner... this seems to be happening as well with medium format where, after the initial seemingly free for all situation, there seems to be a seperation into three main camps going on now: Hassey (with the closed H3 system and the tech know-how absorbed from Imacon and some special sauce from Fujifilm), Leaf/Sinar (with the newish and really cool Hy6/AFi and the new arTec body with the same mount ), Phase One/Mamiya (with their new collaboration on bodies)... so more likely modular would be within a camera company rather than "open standard"... which would probably rule out foveon for the time being and probably Fujifilm sensors as well... although who knows, Fujifilm and Nikon might team up yet...Last edited by theRBK; 27th July 2008 at 04:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,466
|
My point is I am sure they R&D into that, already going on long ago. In fact a few years back there was strong rumour of the prototype going around.
Probably it will move along that direction in the future. When they run out of ideas for the present design and is forced into launching it. It is a matter of when? why jump to step 10 (and then have to worry about how to move on from there ie step 11 to 15) when you are in still step 5 and have already mapped up your step 6 to 10. Hence why speculate about this coming online this year, when hardly the 24mp FF D3x(assuming the nomenclature is that) is not being announced. Hence I find it is nonsensical to speculate at this point. (not nonsensical about the technology) Last edited by chngpe01; 27th July 2008 at 11:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
in the case of improving camera bodies, I think they have run out of ideas... what else can they do?... in-body VR?... that would cut into lens sales... pivoting or even detachable LCD screen?... maybe... wider dispersion of AF points in FX mode?... but would these justify a new body for a photog?... prob not for most... the modular body could be the last major body innovation left... might as well be the first to do it... but modularity to what extent?... who knows, they might have been inspired by RED and come out with something really smashing and modifiable with diff mounts, diff imaging modules, detachable prisms (anyone miss those?), monochrome optimised processing, IR and UV options, option for a really good EVF for lowlight shooting... don't think it would go so far though... and a modular body would allow them to move their top pro camera to a single model, something they had wanted to do previously... as well as make their top pro body more differentiated from the D700, which is really close in features to the D3 and thus cut into D3 sales... I guess we will know more come Sept...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
So is their prices ![]()
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
but enough of OT... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
![]() http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-9999207-1.html ![]() ![]()
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
C , N or R lenses.
![]()
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,483
|
__________________
Photoevangel - Gallery - Photography Evangelism : Spreading the Good photography. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
... photogs have enough on their minds without worrying about making coffee for clients or spills on their clothes... ![]() and as for RED, well, who knows, they might make still cameras some day... heard that the founder of the company is into still photography also... as well, people from another forum have stated that A3 prints from a RED ONE capture not too bad... RED EPIC prints could be even better... convergence of still and motion here we come... maybe a camera where changing a module would change a camera from a still to a motion picture camera... don't think I'ld be the only person who has thought of this... enough incentive for Nikon (or anyone) to make a modular camera I think (if they aren't hard at work on this yet)... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
I see....
But Red lenses only cover Super 35mm which is slightly smaller than DX format, no?Last edited by lsisaxon; 29th July 2008 at 03:00 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|