![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Live in happiness!
Posts: 31
|
Hello to all,
I'm a newbie who's thinking of buying a D80. Just wondering if there's image stabilizer in the camera or lens kit that comes together? I'm worried about my shaky hands... ![]() Any guidance will be appreciated. Thanks hor! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S'pore
Posts: 1,654
|
Nikon DSLRs got no IS/VR.
But some Nikon lenses have VR.
__________________
D90 & P5100 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 214
|
No, the AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED that comes bundled with the D80 kit does not have image stabilisation, or what Nikon terms as VR.
Nikon does not yet have a DSLR with a sensor-based image stabilisation system unlike Sony, Pentax and Olympus. Last edited by whkoh; 20th July 2008 at 10:29 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,026
|
Nikon DSLR camera bodies don't come with image stabilizing (or IS) function. Nikon & Canon rely on VR (or vibration reduction) or IS (image stabilizer) in the the lens. For starter, you may consider these VR lens by Nikon : 16-85 or 18-55 or 18-200
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 66
|
If u're worried abt shaky hands, shoot more. No equipment's going to compensate for shaky hands. That's why posture's impt.
__________________
D300+MB-D10, Nikkor 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 18-200VR, Tamron 17-50/2.8, SB-800+SD-8A |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 754
|
NO, go oly/sony
__________________
http://photobuok.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Live in happiness!
Posts: 31
|
Hi all, thanks for being so helpful. I was told that I probably shouldn't be too worry because at higher shutter speed, shaky hands (except extreme cases) would not be a problem. And at shutter speed of 1/30 or slower, we'll need tripod anyway.
Just a side question, under normal usage and circumstances, how different it is (in term of picture quality) to shoot with and without IS? May I ask the experts out there, will you recommend D80 to a newbie like me, or should i get other DSLR model? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
Posts: 950
|
Nikon same as Canon, IS is on lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 146
|
Hi,
I for one hadn't shot any cameras for years, did bought a D80 to start shooting, loved the camera. with the ability to buy third party lenses without built-in motors as a big plus imho. Once you start playing with the camera, I guess I'd learned about the charateristics to compensate, for example, holding techniques to compensate hand shake to a certain degree, adjusting WB to compensate for color tone, using the different priority modes, etc... Other models like the D60 is also a fine model, but you have to forego the built-in motor, and had to stick with Nikkor AF-S lenses, Sigma HSM or built-in motor models, no Tokina lenses, and only the new Tamrons with built-in motors to be released soon, the lenses are seriously limited. If you just need one camera with a standard 18-55 lens (imo, does not need VR in this range), not intending to pursue the more in-depth knowledge of photography, the D40/40x/60 models will do you just fine. How fine do you think you will go into photography defines what do you should buy. Last edited by nic67; 21st July 2008 at 02:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe and Australia
Posts: 23
|
In my opinion
go for D40x or D60 which ever is cheaper ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 107
|
I think VR/IS technology is getting cheaper. maybe soon kit lens will all be VR/IS. VR on lens is better. But I think if canon starts putting IS in the SLR, nikon will follow too. Or vice versa. Whoever is first.... what go guys think ?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
kit lens already has IS/VR implemented sometime ago, tho cheap but they still cost about $200 more than the non-VR/IS version which is also almost double or more of the price...
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Live in happiness!
Posts: 31
|
Hi ExplorerZ, I visited your Multiply,
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
Last edited by lsisaxon; 24th July 2008 at 03:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 259
|
Guys,
do not forget that the VR or IS tends to lure oneself using slower shutter speed. This will be deterimental to the shot if your subject moves ever so slightly. Fast shutter speed is the key to stopping motion, both your and your subject's. VR is a half measure, but very useful in situation where you want the DOF to be deep, while shutter speed can be slow. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 694
|
as mentioned above, d60 kit lens has VR. aaaand the D80 is a good camera to begin with, albeit a bit old. wait a bit, the D90 is coming out soon (all the shops in funan no longer carry the MB-D80 because they think the D90 is coming soon. annoying!) it won't be too much more than a D80, and the D80 price will drop then. (i bought my first DSLR, a D80 recently. i love it but i wish i had waited for the D90 or saved a little more for the D300.)
Don't buy the D40x/D60 JUST because its cheaper. if you're planning to take up photography on a more serious basis, think further ahead. the D60/40x only auto focusses on AF-S lenses, which is a limitation, especially if you're into sports/street photography. But i admit, the D60/40x/40 is an EXCELLENT camera for its price. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|