![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 639
|
My highlights are sometimes clipped whenever the backlight is too strong. Is there a certain technique to taking this kind of photos? A manual approach to Nikon's D-lighting feature?
I'm using Canon 400D. I'm beginning to wonder if it's because the dynamic range isn't wide enough. I've tried putting the focus point on the darker areas. It helps but not very much sometimes. E.g. In the photo below, the buildings in the background were lost in the highlight. ![]()
__________________
Parka Blogs |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
|
But it is possible to use a technique called HDR (there are some fine examples in this forum, please do a search) if you have a tripod. Expose 2 or 3 shots, one for the shadow and one for the highlight and merge them. The Zohan |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,283
|
it is because certain areas need more exposure, certain areas need less exposure due to differing lighting conditions in those areas. so if you expose for the darker areas, the brighter areas will be blown. exposing for the brighter areas would mean that the darker areas will be underexposed. either way you lose detail. there are two solutions, one is called Graduated Neutral Density filter, which works better for seascapes where the horizon is clearly the divider between dark and bright areas - think sky horizon sea land shots (from top to bottom in that area). it can work here in your given example because the bright areas are obviously in the upper half. you might get unnatural overdarkening of the buildings at the top part but it's an ok sacrifice in my view. another solution is HDR technique. this needs a lot of understanding and caution to not overexploit the technique to produce unnatural, graphic-looking, radioactive (massive haloing) photos. this might be more appropriate here. if you need more information on these techniques, google "luminous landscape _____" (insert "gnd" or "hdr" in the ____). the site should give you rather good writeups on these two photographic tools. cheers! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 92
|
1 alternative is - switch to partial metering & note shutter speed when meter against brightest part. Next note shutter speed when meter against darkest part. In M mode, set a shutter speed value midway between the 2 extreme values. Better still, take in Raw mode. Then output 1 at measured reading, 1 in favour of brightest area & 1 in favour of darkest area. Finally, merge into 1 pic. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,098
|
2) Adjust the contrast using curves.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 275
|
Hmmm, if you're using Photoshop and shooting with raw, does it help if you create multiple smart objects with one normal picture and the other underexpose to bring out the clip areas, apply layer masks and paint over the areas?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,098
|
You could also just get a 5 cent standard screw from your friendly neighborhood hardware shop and a 50 cent screwdriver or hex key. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 118
|
The foreground is well exposed. In fact it can do with a little underexposure, to help keep the distant sunlit buildings from clipping, without looking very dark.
The dynamic range here isn't too insane yet, compared to those with lotsa of sky and clouds, or even the sun. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|