![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Loyang
Posts: 2,233
|
i focused on the word instructions but only the left right and top are in focus....
its a third party(Tamron) lens, anyone got any idea where i can send it for recalibration and roughly how much it cost? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farrer Park
Posts: 987
|
You'll have to sent it for lens calibration with the problem, back focusing.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,126
|
Are you sure it's out of focus, as in, did you select only the center focusing point?
The tube is of OXY is tubular and tapered . Not exactly the best subject to use for a focusing test. Could be that the focusing locked on the further points (sides of tube, and the taoered portion), or that the lens was just that bit too close and past the MFD. Sides, where does one get a Tamron serviced in Singapore? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
Hmm... has anyone ever successfully convinced either Canon or Tamron to calibrate a Canon/Tamron combination?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
It looks like quite a close up shot where the DoF can be quite shallow. Before you blame the misfocus on the lens or the body, did you shoot this handheld or using a tripod? The reason for asking is if you had not used a tripod, there is a chance that you might have moved a little forward after you locked focus before the shutter was released.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Loyang
Posts: 2,233
|
Last edited by blurboiboi; 6th July 2008 at 07:56 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Loyang
Posts: 2,233
|
![]() hi all... with the above pic can i confirm that my lens has back focusing problem??... focusing point is boxed up in white.... shot with tripod and timer... thanks so much.... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,126
|
Yeah, that looks like back-focusing.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 987
|
It just looks like trying to focus nearer than the minimum focusing distance to me. The camera might have just selected the minimum focus distance and taken the shot, regardless of where you're trying to focus.
![]()
__________________
incywincyspider climbup the waterspout... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
Yup.. confirm back focused. If your other lenses are ok, then you should call Tamron up to get the lens calibrated. Sigma is able to calibrate their lenses, so I guess Tamron should do the same rather than pushing the blame to the body. If still under warranty, Tamron should calibrate it for free.
Last edited by lsisaxon; 7th July 2008 at 09:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
I don't think TS is so careless to try to focus at something the lens couldn't. And even if that might be the case, the focus would not lock and sometimes depending on the settings, the shutter would not release.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
|
Focusing with F4, my lens is clear. But at F2.8, it seems to be double image! So is it back focusing problem as well? Just got the lens from a lens swop plus top up. Or does it has a problem working with 40D?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
|
Hope u get the repair free since its under waranty
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
Either way, expect to face a one month waiting time for it to be sent back to Japan for calibration
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
|
After reading all this, comparing the Tamron 17-50 and the Tokina 16-50, would you all prefer Tokina?
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 132
|
found this interesting comparison http://www.flickr.com/photos/nschaden/1332341897/ from my point of view, in terms of picture quality, it seems that tamron is a tad better anyway coming back to the topic, yeah it sure looks like back focusing. wat lens r u using and on which body ah-boi?
__________________
Photographs doesn't arouse me, but the hard work it took to make them does. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 545
|
If you own a Canon, not worth buying a 3rd party lens for 900+ when for a hundred or so bucks more, can get a original Canon lens...and an L at that.
__________________
Canon EOS 30D , EF 17-40mm F4L USM , EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 62
|
sorry but can someone explain what back focusing is?
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 132
|
u can go to this link n read up a bit http://focustestchart.com/chart.html
scroll down to "What is back focus?" ![]()
__________________
Photographs doesn't arouse me, but the hard work it took to make them does. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|