![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,212
|
Hi
why did u choose to go with the Canon system? wat is it you like about Canon cameras, and wat is it that made u choose your current Canon camera / equipment over that from other brands? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 49
|
why canon..
if your friend all have canon.. then you can borrow and try the lens?flash and learn the limitation and strength of the lens before you buy yourself. why canon, becasue got cheap lens with image stabilizer. 28-135is 75-300is why canon because i do not have ten exquisite nikkor manual lens left by my father,.. why canon canon equipment are alittle cheaper than nikkon for some things however this was not true years ago.... why minolata becasue they have excellent bodies... becasue they have excellent bodies.. why not minolta becasue their lens why nikon because they have fully mechanical body that is unlikely to fail when you go on a two thousand dollar trip to europe after the exams. can carry one thousand dollars worth of lens. why nikon beacuse you can get the manual lens second hand at loweer price. why nikon their flash is fantastic man! (continue on the next post) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 49
|
why contax
becxause their lens is great but some expensive why not contax because their body fail easily(no comment on N1 andNx) why contax becasue manual focus why not contax becasue manual focus why lecia their lens is great. why lecia best manual body in r6.2(my dreAM CAMERA) why lecia manual focus why not lecia manual focus why not lecia NO MONEY LAH!!!!!!!!! NO MONEY NO MONEY |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
ClubSNAP Idol
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jalan Suka
Posts: 5,321
|
Why not Canon?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 49
|
why not canon
because they do not have a manual body why not canon becasue i do no llike my lens to be white colur and when i take out of my bag, everyone within five hundred miles look at me as if i am bradd pitt. why not canon beacuse the stupid flash .have to look up and see if properly exposed or not.. why not canon because no mechanical body "make with the best you have, and create the best you can, and the best will be the best" |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
why canon?
ease of use. why canon? my 1st shot exhibited was shot by a 888 why canon? cos it's fast why not nikon? some of the ppl i know think they are a pro cos they use a nikon why not nikon? cos im a canon supporter why not leica? no $$ why not contax? neva used b4....ex also 1/2 |
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
Why canon?
You go ask the FROG... ![]()
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katong
Posts: 4,702
|
Because the D30 is a Canon.
If Nikon had made the D30, I would have bought a Nikon. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 597
|
This thread damn funny!!!
Almost fell off my chair laugh...heheheh |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,212
|
Hi
yeah...very entertaining thread so far... keep them coming! Why Canon? Tell us your positive experiences with Canon, and maybe a few negative ones u would like to see changed. for all you know, we may make enough noise for someone from Canon to sit up and take notice ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 27
|
Why Canon? Because my father a canon EOS 88 camera as my first camera and since I never felt the need to switch, I stuck with Canon.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 208
|
Ive been a Nikon shooter for over 15 yrs. I was using a F90x and a FM2. But the AF is too slow on the F90x with focus tracking It's bad even with my 80-200 f/2.8 (but non-AFS). Theres so many incompatibility with Nikon lens and bodies these days... if I decide to buy some new lens I probly cant use with my F90x and FM2. Like the new 70-200 VR lens. Have to spend $$$$$ and upgrade body first. Mebbe after 3 yrs that body also wont work with some newer/better lens.
Ive used the Canon bodies often when shooting with friends. I recently got a good deal on an EOS system so I dumped my Nikons and bought it. The AF tracking with the USM lens is superb. Oso no incompatibility with old/new lens and body. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,082
|
No comments on the Nikon v Canon issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
|
I think canon is more professional in the DSLR's world.(I have an analog canon)it's true that canon hasn't a manual body now,but you can buy a used budy,for example a canon F1.These machines are in good condition.
And why canon? My first camera was a minolta! Hm...becouse I have used a canon eos 33V for ages,and I think it's a very good camera.I like it! |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
+1 before lock.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apex Circle
Posts: 1,360
|
because C comes before N in the alphabet....
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clementi
Posts: 2,470
|
wahha same here! my dad's first was a eos650. from then on all canon, except my film compact which is olympus. er...ok lets try why canon? cos thats what canons do - shoot right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Son
Posts: 2,598
|
because.........Can - On, i buy something that can- on, if cannot on for what....
![]()
__________________
www.ubans.com Last edited by xl1; 28th October 2005 at 06:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bedok, Singapore
Posts: 612
|
This thread...
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|