Canon - Exhilaration Of Sight 450
I got myself a 55-250 IS after selling my 28-300 mm Sigma. I have NEVER used the 55-250 IS in real life before! It's a great lens for its price but somehow, I just don't find it all that useful. Doesn't help that I have a 200-500 Tamron lol.
Research Institute for Unicultural Visual Arts - Riuva.com
Sorry to hijack the thread as i have similar ques. I have the 18-55 kit lens and looking for a wide angle lens for panorama/landscape. Which would you guys recommend (Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, Tamron AF 11-18mm F/4.5-5.6 or Tokina AT-X 11-16 f/2.8 - this 1 way off budget or any other) ? Is it for worth for me to get the Tamron 17-55 F2.8 as it has a larger f?
Last edited by fitzy; 26th September 2008 at 09:20 PM.
2) If the 11-16 f/2.8 is out of your budget, so would the Sigma 10-20.
3) Why would you want a Tamron 17-55 if you are looking for a lens wider than the kit lens?
Alright will do a search on the wide angle lens mentioned. I have read good reviews on the Tamron 17-55, about IQ and also it has a larger f that makes me tempted to get it to replace the kit lens but not sure if its worth it.