Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Comparision of Editing

  1. #1

    Default Comparision of Editing

    Hi all, please give comments and/or vote between these two pictures (001 or 002), which editing is preferred.

    001


    002

  2. #2

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    ok, i prefer the edited version. btw wat was the focus at? the buildings? and the picture seemed kinda blown out to me at some points. just my two cents worth

  3. #3

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by HTCahHTC View Post
    ok, i prefer the edited version. btw wat was the focus at? the buildings? and the picture seemed kinda blown out to me at some points. just my two cents worth
    if i'm not wrong both pictures are edited.
    One day you'll see.

  4. #4
    Member/Tangshooter zaxh81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,339

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    i prefer 001

  5. #5

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by HTCahHTC View Post
    ok, i prefer the edited version. btw wat was the focus at? the buildings? and the picture seemed kinda blown out to me at some points. just my two cents worth
    focus at the middle of tall building. maybe i added too much warm, dats y the picture looks blown. i will take note of this in future... thanks for valuable comments.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by hidden3 View Post
    if i'm not wrong both pictures are edited.
    yes both edited, but #002 only add in abit warm.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by zaxh81 View Post
    i prefer 001
    ok, tks for ur sappork..

  8. #8
    Member Parka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    1,067

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    First one is better.

    The increased colour saturation improves the contrast for the elements in the photo.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by Parka View Post
    First one is better.

    The increased colour saturation improves the contrast for the elements in the photo.
    noted, tks.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    I also prefer the first one... But please pull back the on the saturation for the blue channel. The sky is looking very unnatural.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    I also prefer the first one... But please pull back the on the saturation for the blue channel. The sky is looking very unnatural.
    ok, will watch out for this in future.. thks..

  12. #12

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by Parka View Post
    First one is better.

    The increased colour saturation improves the contrast for the elements in the photo.
    yup! agree!! #001's colours are much more pleasing to the eye. #002 looks little dull.
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  13. #13
    Senior Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Upper Bukit Timah
    Posts
    11,667

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    A pointed out, 1st one is better but only in some ways. The contrast in the buildings is good but the sky is not. 2nd one is just too washed out to make the photo appear interesting. Given this, I would do a B&W conversion based on the 1st.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by fergo View Post
    yup! agree!! #001's colours are much more pleasing to the eye. #002 looks little dull.
    tks for the vote..

  15. #15

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Quote Originally Posted by Kit View Post
    A pointed out, 1st one is better but only in some ways. The contrast in the buildings is good but the sky is not. 2nd one is just too washed out to make the photo appear interesting. Given this, I would do a B&W conversion based on the 1st.
    tks for the input, will take note of it..

  16. #16

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    No1 phot very rich... No2 appeared to be over exposed.

    Can you get one in between?

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tiong Bahru
    Posts
    683

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    Certainly 001.... No 002 seem like normal shoot straight from camera without any filter effect (boring)...
    No 001 is quite pleasant

  18. #18

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    i will post a photo in between dull and rich soon.. for comparision..

  19. #19

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    thanks all.

  20. #20
    Member boombox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,225

    Default Re: Comparision of Editing

    photo 2 looks relatively interesting, and it's the usual stuff you'd normally see in real life, the colours are rather neutral. all that went out of the window when you turn to see photo 1 - which seemed to have its curves bumped on the bright/dark end in comparison to photo 2.

    Of course, when put together, photo 1 is the attention grabber.

    Preference wise, none - if both are put together.
    Photo 1 now becomes too vivid,
    Photo 2 now becomes too dull,

    But if you put them on their own, they both work for me.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •