![]() |
|
|||||||
| Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!! |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampines
Posts: 66
|
I am an avid diver and I want to pick up underwater photography. I borrowed a friends Sony T1 with marine casing to try it out at Tioman last weekend. I realised that the photos are dark and not very clear. The flash doesn't seem powerful enough. I want to get my own set but I would like some advise on what is a good model to start off with? Should I go for the strobe lights and stuff together with the camera and where can I find these items.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Deep Deep in the sea
Posts: 3,234
|
first question
![]() Do you have a budget? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,591
|
LOL yeah.. budget budget budget. A basic setup (point shoot) can start from $800 and head all the way up in excess of $10k for a full DSLR setup
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 153
|
![]() ![]() if u flood a dslr u have to spend another dslr to replace if u flood a compact not so xiong but still heart pain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampines
Posts: 66
|
Well, I'm currently using a Nikon D200. I don't know if i should go for a marine casing for my DSLR as I checked, a marine casing for my D200 will cost around $1600 to $1800. My budget is about $1000. I was thinking of getting the Canon G9 with marine casing. I heard it would cost $1118 for camera and casing. Is the Canon G9 a good buy?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 361
|
Many people use that G9 and had gotten fantastic results. It just a case of getting the best of what you have ...
__________________
The rule is there are no rules. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, Singapore
Posts: 1,185
|
i think it's closer to 2k and up. a decent strobe and arms will set you back almost 1k already.
the camera is about 7-800, and the canon housing probably $300. if you choose to go with the ikelite housing (which i think is the better option), it'll be $800. now, who said underwater photography is a cheap hobby? ((= |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bukit Timah
Posts: 1,202
|
![]() Eat your heart out DSLR users. ![]()
__________________
Canon 50D/60mm & 100mm Macro/Tokina 10-17mm FE/Nexus Housing Inon Z-240 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere North
Posts: 2,635
|
![]() ![]() Inon Z240 = $900++ Ultralight = $400 and above |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, Singapore
Posts: 1,185
|
wow, right place at the right time. what can i say.
that's the great advantage of P&S and cameras with an electronic shutter. shutter speed of 1/500! shwing! |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, Singapore
Posts: 1,185
|
haha. try D2000s with 10bar arms or maybe even ULCS arms. or an ikelite DS51 with ikelite ball-clamp arms. S&S YS27 with tray and arms. all under $1k. compacts have more than 1:1 now. the ricoh gx100/S&S DX-1G has a 2inch MFD at 72mm equivalent. that's definitely considered super macro. and you can stop down to f/15.6 i think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bukit Timah
Posts: 1,202
|
With add-on lens from inon you're able to get more than 1:1. My friend's old foggy olympus with 10X optical zoom is able to get a half body shot of a pygmy filling the frame, that's super macro, haha...
![]()
__________________
Canon 50D/60mm & 100mm Macro/Tokina 10-17mm FE/Nexus Housing Inon Z-240 |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere North
Posts: 2,635
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 294
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 63
|
Photos fr G9 taken without strobe http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianmayes/ (w lots of talent & some diy - add-on macro lens adaptor) But if u like wide-angle stuff, then large investment is required..
So i would say buy a 2nd hand G9 (which is still very new) & get a Canon housing if u dun mind (mine s a 2nd hand housing - working ok touchwood)... Or wait for G10 (to enjoy taking wide-angle ambience shots & maybe a whaleshark or 2??) |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
|
Hi Guys,
What about S&S DX-1G (ricoh gx100)? Anyone use this yet underwater? Is this camera better then the G9? I know someone here use the Ricoh gx100 on land and it seem pretty good...wonder how its' performance underwater? |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
|
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=416230 http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=380212 What I like is the wide-angle (24mm native and you can go as wide as 16mm with the wide-angle converter lens for it). Macro ability is good too (I haven't tried it with any close-up lenses yet). I also like how compact it is with the housing - unlike a G9 with ikelite housing which is huge (as big as a dslr). Only downside is that it is a little slow when shooting RAW (I'm comparing here to using DSLRs) - I always shoot RAW though. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|