![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 245
|
I'm thinking of EOS30, but wondering what lenses to get and their prices (new and 2nd hand prices).
Mainly will be for animals (zoo, pets etc) and scenary. Any advise? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 417
|
I'm thinking of getting the f/4 version as well as the 17-40 f/4. Maybe get prime lens like the 20mm too since I tend to go wide when shooting landscapes. andrew |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 417
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Punggol Park
Posts: 2,020
|
Since u wan advice, I advise u take eos 33 with 29-135 usm IS.
33 wif date could cost less than $695 now. 28-135 lens cost about $960 at CP. Good buy must buy ![]()
__________________
EOS 40D;50mm f1.4 ; Lancer EX Sports 2.0 Fan of Man Utd since 1977 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: here
Posts: 3,752
|
the 28-135 is usm cost $820 at CP
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 373
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere Out There
Posts: 2,269
|
IMHO, if I were in your position and armed with the knowledge of equipment and type of photography that I want to work on, I would get a EOS 30 and look for a 28-200 USM lens.
The reason? It is the best overall performer in terms of focal length. 200mm at f/5.6 should be able to get you some decent shots at the zoo, while 28mm at f/3.5 would get you wide enough to do landscape shots. If not, you could get a cheaper 28-90mm and get a zoom lens 75-300mm USM. That could be the other way to go. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 245
|
Thank you all for the replies...
ok, I've think I will get the body and 28-105 lens first. Will get another 70-300 lens later on (since I'm not planning any trips to the zoo at the moment :P) But some stuff I'm not sure abt.... (sorry totally new at all these) 1) USM = what's the use for it? 2) IS = when do we need such a function? While zooming? So IS is more relevant for 70-300 compared to 28-135? 3) focal length? The wider the range the better?? also, does CP/AP takes a long time to reply on equote.... I've been waiting abt a week for the reply. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 373
|
1) Ultra Sonic Motor: It's one of Canon's genre of focusing motor that gives the lens the ability to focus faster... Canon has other types of focusing motor like the DC motor etc... but slower
2) Image Stabiliser: To aid in hand holding the camera in low light. Typically, the rule of thumb for the selection of shutter speed would be the reciprocal of the focal length; say if you extend a zoom lens to 50mm, the lowest shutter speed you OUGHT to have is 1/60s. Any less, you would run the risk of getting blur images or what they call "camera shake". The IS function allows you to go one to two stop below the "rule". Hence, you can use a speed say 1/15s (two stops less) 3) Focal length: The wider the range....... the wider? Not necessary better, just .... wider. Traditionally, prime lens (fixed focal) give generally better images than zoom ones. But more recent zoom lens (exclusively almost refering to Canon's L lens) produce very good results that matched or even surpass the primes. But in general, you can't expect to have a lens to cover all focal length without giving something up. Try reading up on the reviews of the lens you're interested in; user reviews/comments, test charts and results and make your decision based on your (1) Budget, (2) Need & Requirement... Hmm, can't think of anything else.Btw, the eos 30 is a great camera... It's the only thing i bought new. Hope the above helps. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 373
|
Sorry... "Cheong Hei".
Just to make a suggestion: IMHO, getting a general zoom like the 28-105mm is convenient for the "all purpose" usage like family gathering, travelling etc, as a stuck on lens. You would probably not want to commit into the 75-300 range without first having the general lens; ...or you'd have to shoot noses at family outings and gatherings. The 28-105mm mk II is good; i owned i before. The mk I is its predecessor; but it seems to scumble to fogging and other probably rather easily. Prob due to the age of the lens. Cheers. tert |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 417
|
That's probably quite a good buy. The 28-105 lens comes highly recommended for general photography. Whilst it is convenient to use a zoom, bear in mind that it is probably better to visualise the image you want before even raising the camera to your eye. A very good way to really learn about photography is to go to the subject you are interested in with just a sketch book and pencil, not a camera. Do a lot of sketches of stuff you want to photography. Then go and take photographs and see if you can get the image like those that you've sketched. Compare the photos with sketches and see how different they are. This way you'll gradually learn to "sketch" with your camera. Try it, it's fun! And one more thing, start with slides rather than negatives.
regards andrew |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: West
Posts: 1,109
|
get the 28-105mm it's great!! as for the equote tink u call them better i oso waited so long for my equote in the end called them n got a good price
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: West
Posts: 1,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 245
|
okie thanks.... will see if I have time to go downt his weekend
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|