![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
|
Normally we see ppl take the NTU SADM as the heart-shape thingy with the green rooftop, but I decided to take it from a different angle at night...
Comments anyone? Some have told me it looked as if the picture has been sliced into half.... =x Canon EOS 400D, F/8, Shutter speed 20sec, ISO 200... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,036
|
The building's unique form and details are lost in this photo because you chosed to photograph it after dark. The lights from the buildings inthe background, being significantly brighter, takes attention away from your main subject. Its not really a good attempt if your intentions were to focus on SADM.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 821
|
This pic has no focus. Honestly. Everything in it is so distracting. And it only makes my eyes swirl round the pic twice and out of the frame without knowing what the pic is.
__________________
My Humble Flickr --> The pavement of my thoughts |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member/Tangshooter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore, western area
Posts: 5,083
|
interesting, i like how the office show through the glass panels at night. i would not have expected that in the day.
i agree with kit that this scene isn't justifying the subject at all. why not try other perspective from near lower steps and shooting at solely the glass panels, i think that will be much much better, and you wont have distracting details as well, the only other thing besides the glass will be the night sky. you got me interested in going there for a night shoot someday ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PARISris , Singapore
Posts: 2,297
|
are you in adm? i wanna try apply for it but maybe im not as good yet
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: near the Equator
Posts: 1,257
|
IMO, the image does not portray the subject accurately. However, it might work in another fashion, perhaps abstract. But you might have to clean up some wild elements in the image as it is somewhat confusing.
Cheers.
__________________
We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities. - Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
|
perhaps I change the title to fit the photo?
cos i dunno what name to give this pic in the first place... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 50
|
hrm, i think it does look sliced in half.
maybe 'cos i'm from NTU. then used to seeing the whole thing. so it looks like it's lost a huge part of it. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 50
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|