![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
Hi all!
Below is a pic I've taken during my school's chinese orchestra concert and I did some editing. My aim was to capture the look, the eyes and the concentration of the performers Flash was not permitted, was using 75-300mm F4-5.6 lens, so ISO had to be 500 and above. I wasn't allowed to move around. On the stage and all performers are seated, body parts or instrument of other performers will come into the frame of my subject, anyone got such experience? Any ideas how to overcome it? C&C welcomed. In terms of cropping, composition and exposure. Thanks ![]() ![]() Last edited by gymak90; 29th May 2008 at 01:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
The first, most awkward thing about this photograph is the composition; the performer looks as though she's playing to a wall, because she is placed on the left one-third, and she is facing left, pretty much right into the edge of the frame. There is no nose-room (also known as look-room).
Generally speaking, in order to give look-room, one must frame the photo with the subject on the right one-third when he/she is looking left, and vice versa if the subject is looking right. In this way, there is a space where the subject is looking towards, rather than a "wall", in the form of your photo's edge. The photo looks to me as though it is underexposed. I don't understand why you picked a strange ISO figure as 500, instead of pushing the ISO to 800 or 1600, shoot RAW, and correct the noise in post-processing. What camera are you using? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Serangoon North
Posts: 2,050
|
If you are tasked or paid to shoot the performance, you need to find the best location to shoot the performers beforehand. Maybe go to their rehearsal and seek out the best spot and tell the organiser to reserve that spot for you. If you are there as an audience and couldn't get a good shot from your spot, best is to just keep your camera and just enjoy the show.
For indoor shot, bump up the ISO to 1000 and above, use the widest aperture(F2.8 and below) and lens with IS will help reduce handshake or use tripod/monopod if possible. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
Or should I choose to photo someone who is in the 1st row, facing the conductor? This way, I can try to get the conductor in the frame? I was shooting in JPEG, so I had to struggle with noise and blur. My shutter speed was probably in the range of 1/30s - 1/60s.
![]() The lens is a non-IS, non-USM version of 75-300mm F4-5.6. Quite primitive, haha, and challenging to use it indoors. But in the concert, I needed the range. Thanks guys for the input! |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi,
I tried a crop that was in portrait from the top of the girls head to the base of the instrument. This cut out the top of the instruments neck and her left arm by some margin but put the girl much to the right and also gave a good look to it. May be try it and see what you think ![]() Cheers ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
For the 30D, I used to be on a 30D too and I've shot up to ISO 1600 without fear. Push your ISO for more handholdable shutter speeds. You can do basic noise reduction within Photoshop itself. Read what I posted previously; if you shoot RAW, you can do noise reduction with Canon's Digital Photo Professional software too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
![]()
Many thanks for the advice ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
![]() In case you are unaware, since the 10D generation of Canon DSLRs, Canon's noise handling has been stellar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
True, canon dslrs have very good noise processing. I'm sure it's competitors are closing the gap.
Thanks to everyone for sharing |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 284
|
hmmm..
looks like SCH. Anyway, would suggest that you set your WB to tungsten during concert shoots, the colours are much more natural that way. ISO should be about 800 or higher and shutter can go to 1/80s. but if you were at SCH, lighting shouldnt be a problem at ISO 500. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 284
|
slightly underexposed, but seems pretty okay to me. http://www.flickr.com/photos/r_goh/2...7605296313007/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Far North
Posts: 737
|
Hmm i suppose your shot is in tungsten WB? Yea it does more natural and comparing with mine, my shot looks reddish. Haha thanks ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|