![]() |
|
|||||||
| Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
|
I want to buy a UV filter, most for protection, which one do you propose?
Is it good this one:http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Hoya-67mm-Pro1...QQcmdZViewItem |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 3,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
So Hoya optics are opaque?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Not meaning to belittle the optical superiority of B+W (heck, I use B+W too), but really for non-critical applications, Hoya and Kenko also deliver with minimal fuss. If you're looking for every bit of resolving power, you'd be going filter-less.
More on general use, you don't have to splash on Hoya or Kenko's Pro1 series. Simple HMC or even normal Coated UV filters are good enough. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member/Tangshooter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North West of Singapore
Posts: 1,016
|
Yah I agree if for normal use no need to splash on B+W, it's up to individual also.
For my case after having used Tokin & Hoya I find that B+W is still the best so far and will continue to buy B+W and not any other brand. YMMV.
__________________
flickr | Tangshooter |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: big tree town
Posts: 1,653
|
just buy the cheap tokina or hoya ones will do. they are gd, most of the time. more expensive ones are better, but only if u are willing to pay for that kind of price. but i tell u, if u are picky, expensive filters are worth it. yes, i am picky, i am using Nikon NC for my lenses.
![]()
__________________
cameras are not made of tofu |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
|
Well, am I covered(in general) with this combination: https://018495b.netsolstores.com/ind...ROD&ProdID=292
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Tokina filters are a different story. I've had a bad run-in with Tokina filters (no offence to anyone using them); they cause ghosting. I've used two of them, one on a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 and one on a Canon 10-22, and both times, as long as there was a decently strong light source in the frame, I'd get ghosting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
|
Yes thats the price but shipping is 19$...(for only UV is 9.5$)
Its the cheapest price cause its a shop out ebay fees(he does have ebay shop also). Do you think I have to buy this combination or only the UV? I have (for now) tamron 17-50 and the use is general... |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
I used a CPL on that lens for awhile (borrowed the lens from a friend) but decided to go without it, mainly 'cause I only dabble with landscape occasionally and on wider lenses, with a CPL, you will get uneven polarisation, hence if only to darken the sky, Graduated ND filters are a better choice.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
|
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,445
|
How about Heliopan? Is it better than B+W? Sorry TS, hijack ur thread
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 542
|
Put it this way... i was once told...
You buy good lenses with good glass... your filter must not diminish that value. i.e. it depends on your lens... good lens with good glass/coats buy something more decent like B+W... so-so lens just any one will do... hope this helps... for some of my cheaper lenses like the canon 50mm 1.8 i don't even bother... |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,491
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|