Page 15 of 18 FirstFirst ... 5101314151617 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 358

Thread: Comments directed to models, why not.

  1. #281

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Triazolium View Post
    GWCs and XMMs keep each other in business. I don't know what can be done that doesn't involve a sniper rifle.
    Or a blunt spoon? Hurts more.
    Alpha

  2. #282

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daedalus Trent View Post
    i've completely changed my standpoint
    you are deadpoet were so right
    GWCs don't see themselves as GWCs because they are blinded by short skirts and vampire teeth (kawaii???) and their lenses are constantly fogged up by their horniness. XMMs don't see themselves as XMMs because they are blinded by dollar signs.
    Available as a model, photographer, and art director/stylist.

  3. #283
    Senior Member Leong23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    within myself
    Posts
    3,186

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
    Or a blunt spoon? Hurts more.
    Blunt spoon will be told off as insult.

    This is what happen to deadpoet when he give honest comments to one of the recent xmm thread.

    Really piss off with those BS GWC......

  4. #284
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Singapore, western area
    Posts
    5,337

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Triazolium View Post
    GWCs and XMMs keep each other in business. I don't know what can be done that doesn't involve a sniper rifle.
    press "1" and switch to knife mode. bunny hop around and get your business done.

  5. #285
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Singapore, east-ish
    Posts
    2,291

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    why the violence?
    Smite the infidel with Cunning Arguments!

    Is there hope for GWCs and XMMs to shed their vile ways and become true photographers/models respectively?

  6. #286
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daedalus Trent View Post
    why the violence?
    Smite the infidel with Cunning Arguments!

    Is there hope for GWCs and XMMs to shed their vile ways and become true photographers/models respectively?
    No idea on that...

    but from what I see, dun think there is much hope unless they realise the real deal.
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

  7. #287

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Pardon my ignorance. What does "GWC" stand for?

  8. #288
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    floating in space.
    Posts
    795

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunbucker View Post
    Pardon my ignorance. What does "GWC" stand for?
    Yeah, I was thinking the exact same thing.

    We already have enough acronyms here in Singapore.
    D∞X, 1-∞ mm F0.17. I like to show off my equipment list because I'm pro. My Flickr

  9. #289
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Singapore, western area
    Posts
    5,337

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    guys with camera..

  10. #290
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    floating in space.
    Posts
    795

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by sprintist View Post
    guys with camera..
    HAHAHAHAHA. Are you serious?!?! Someone actually came up with an acronym for that? That's pretty darn lame.
    D∞X, 1-∞ mm F0.17. I like to show off my equipment list because I'm pro. My Flickr

  11. #291

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by sprintist View Post
    guys with camera..
    LOL!

    This means any dude with a camera phone is also a GWC?

  12. #292
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Singapore, east-ish
    Posts
    2,291

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy_h View Post
    HAHAHAHAHA. Are you serious?!?! Someone actually came up with an acronym for that? That's pretty darn lame.
    lame?!

    its probably the biggest insult to any self-respecting photographer!



    Quote Originally Posted by zac08 View Post
    but from what I see, dun think there is much hope unless they realise the real deal.
    hmm...if you put it that way, i'm extremely pessimistic on them 'realising the real deal'
    Last edited by Daedalus Trent; 11th June 2008 at 03:30 PM.

  13. #293

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy_h View Post
    HAHAHAHAHA. Are you serious?!?! Someone actually came up with an acronym for that? That's pretty darn lame.
    If you are around here long enough, you will know that there are many egoistic members who will create new acronym for others but it actually describes them best .....
    it's a hyena personality ...
    always the Light, .... always.

  14. #294
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    floating in space.
    Posts
    795

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daedalus Trent View Post
    lame?!

    its probably the biggest insult to any self-respecting photographer!
    The act of coming up with an acronym for that is lame. Not that a "guy with a camera" is lame.
    D∞X, 1-∞ mm F0.17. I like to show off my equipment list because I'm pro. My Flickr

  15. #295
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    ladies and gentlemen

    i would strongly advise against the use of violence or the hint of violence directed at other members.
    those posts above will be given an infraction.

    although i also do not agree with the going ons with the XMMs and the GWCs
    i think that the posts are uncalled for, please show some maturity and restraint in your postings

  16. #296
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Singapore, east-ish
    Posts
    2,291

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy_h View Post
    The act of coming up with an acronym for that is lame. Not that a "guy with a camera" is lame.
    haha, sry for the misunderstanding
    yea, its not as if we don't already have enough A.C.R.O.N.Y.M.S

  17. #297

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    If you stick around in the photography (particularly portraits) business long enough, you'll eventually learn that GWC stands for "Guy With Camera", which is a derogatory term for any guy who picks up a camera just to be able to shoot girls with skimpy or no clothing on.

    Canonised, don't go insulting the people who use it. The term GWC has been around for a very long time. Why would egotistical people take the time to come up with a term for other people- wouldn't they come up with terms for themselves? I could never come up with such a concise term for such photogs anyway. My general term for guys like that is a**hole.
    Available as a model, photographer, and art director/stylist.

  18. #298
    Senior Member Leong23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    within myself
    Posts
    3,186

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Canonised View Post
    If you are around here long enough, you will know that there are many egoistic members who will create new acronym for others but it actually describes them best .....
    it's a hyena personality ...
    You talking to me too?

    Do check out the images taken those people who actively use this term and you might reconsider the above statement

    If DP, Night86mare, myself and the others are GWC, that those guys we referring to will be far worst. (Just compare the images we taken will do, very straight forward)

    Actually it is nothing wrong regarding GWC & XMM issue, there had been around long before i started photography during film era. The point is the uprise of them in CS actually lower the photo quality of the forum. This is what some of us hate to see.

    Do you want see CS become a lousy photography forum when many of the better photogarpher refuse to post here because they felt it is an insult to them to post side by side with a lousy snap shot.

  19. #299
    Senior Member Sion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    新天地
    Posts
    4,768

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Triazolium View Post
    If you stick around in the photography (particularly portraits) business long enough, you'll eventually learn that GWC stands for "Guy With Camera", which is a derogatory term for any guy who picks up a camera just to be able to shoot girls with skimpy or no clothing on.
    Before we condemn GWCs, maybe we should look carefully at the source of the whole problem i.e. "those girls with skimpy or no clothing on".

    GWCs won't be GWCs without "those girls with skimpy or no clothing on".

  20. #300

    Default Re: Comments directed to models, why not.

    tis is a strange forum
    how come can call names to other?

Page 15 of 18 FirstFirst ... 5101314151617 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •