garou12 is gone.
garou12 is gone.
Want to know and learn how COMMENTS ARE DIRECTED TO MODELS? Go and watch
AMERICA'S NEXT TOP MODEL
Broadcasting at CHANNEL 5, RIGHT NOW!!!!
But alas, you are right, beauty is subjective. But, in response to instances of extremely acrid remarks made regarding the physical features of models, I think the model can find out for himself/herself how she/he looks in the eyes of others.
Like I've mentioned before, if the model's appearance serves the purpose of the photographer... if the photographer wants a below-standard model... then who am I to criticize... La la la la!
Employer - Employee
Interviewer - Interviewee
Photograher - Photographee Not everyone can be called a 'model'
Whatever it is, enjoy the weekend (one way is to stay away from this thread ), I know I will cos I'm off to Hong Kong to get my hands on the new HTC Diamond!! And then return to catch the opening Euro 2008 game.
Pictures always should have a special story behind it or a special meaning to the photographer.
I miss u from the bottom of my heart, as u are very humor indeed.
I wish u all the best in another forum, and pls let me know where u are so that we can be humor together.
Eat breath LIVERPOOL!!!
I also can be a model.
You know those slimming advertisements in the newspapers? I can be the "Before" model. Anyone wants to be the "After" model?
If a model looks old, why is the remark "old" sound acrid? You are too politically correct in your approach! And that is a compliment.
For the sake of mankind, please, those guilty ones out there, for the love of all STOP with the analogies. They are just so putrid, immature and does not serve to get the message across. Just makes things more confusing.
movie critics do not make movies, food critics do not necessarily cook
by saying that only someone who has shot something can comment on that thing is ridiculous and ludicrous.
pat pat, i have taken photos of children and people as well, you need to spend more time looking through my gallery. and if you do not consider swans, squirrels and people living things, time to look up the scientific dictionary
i am glad that you do not comment on landscapes, but you do not have to enforce your own ridiculous brand of logic on me. are you saying now that people cannot comment on your maggi mee stunt unless they have done it too? oh dear, talk about your preaching of free speech.. double standards.. (once again)
Last edited by night86mare; 6th June 2008 at 08:44 PM.
for one thing, khtee has no bloody idea what he is talking about, i don't see a single linkage between his post and the exchange between me and dp..
I have faith in most of the participants here alright..
But I noticed that some over there at EDWM seems to pay quite a close attention to the models or event pics posted here and linked our pics there now & then.. maybe I am a bit pessimistic, but I tot if a fraction of them decided to gang up here they may well outnumbered us by a few folds..
For example, your sentosa bird shooting thread which is so hugely popular gather around 100+ replies and 8000+ views here in CS, that is already consider a huge number by CS standards. But one check at EDWM and there are actually quite a number of threads with more than 10,000+ replies and 100,000+ views..
I am worrying the CS community may kena stampede if the moderation is removed...
IF HWZ failed, does it means CS needs to become thought police?
I am absolutely using extreme examples here, but then purely to counter irreverent comparisons.