ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 21st January 2002   #1
Robert
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default Newbie Qn: Is It Possible With This Budget ?

I am looking for a digital camera to complement my existing Canon EOS 500.

I have this usual problem of snapping a picture and not being able to develop it until I complete all 24 or 36 shots (don't want to waste), so I figured this would be a good time to get a digital camera.

With a budget of about $600, I've been surfing and reading the various posts in HWZ and comparing specs etc until it gets very confusing, so I hope all you experts here can recommend.

Basically, I want something simple that even the wife can use, point-n-shoot (like the EOS).

Zoom: 6X Preferred, but can live with 3X
Video: Not necessary
Pixels: 2.1 MegaPixels
Medium: *please explain which is more popular/convenient/cheaper - CF or SM*
Accessories: Can I put a UV filter or external flash etc.

Also, like most still cameras, can I get the shots to have the date imprinted when I print on an Epson Stylus Photo printer?

So you see, a total digicam newbie.

Any recommendations?

Thanks + regards

(** no flames please **)
 
Old 21st January 2002   #2
Kei
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,090
Default

Hm, maybe you can take a look at fuji finepix 2800. It's a point and shoot cam, with 6x zoom, 2.1mp, uses sm. Bad side will be limited performance in night shots, and not able to add any other accessories on the body itself.

http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/fu...iew/index.html
Kei is offline  
Old 21st January 2002   #3
Robert
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi

Thanks for your reply.

I did consider the FinePix 2800, but Alan Photo quoted me $680 yesterday, so it's above the $600 limit (also have wife-acceptance-factor-cum-limit).

They quoted the A20 at $580 and 2600 at $515 (or thereabouts).

Both are 3x zoom.

But for comparison sake and keeping resolution to the same, which (CF or SM) can hold more shots for 128MB?

Thanks

Quote:
Originally posted by Keito
Hm, maybe you can take a look at fuji finepix 2800. It's a point and shoot cam, with 6x zoom, 2.1mp, uses sm. Bad side will be limited performance in night shots, and not able to add any other accessories on the body itself.

http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/fu...iew/index.html
 
Sponsored Link
Old 21st January 2002   #4
weeguy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jurong, S'pore
Posts: 196
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Robert
Hi

But for comparison sake and keeping resolution to the same, which (CF or SM) can hold more shots for 128MB?

not too sure whether there's a diff (i mean, 128mb means 128mb rite?) fer tt...

but most cameras using SM is compatible only up to 128mb and not fer larger capacities cos the device controller is built into the camera....

and even though CF may be thicker than SM, it has a built in device controller so tt means cameras using CF can support fer larger capacity CF cards in the future...
weeguy is offline  
Old 21st January 2002   #5
Kei
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Robert
Hi

Thanks for your reply.

But for comparison sake and keeping resolution to the same, which (CF or SM) can hold more shots for 128MB?

Thanks
It's roughly the same but the storage capacities available for cf is much higher then sm(largest card is 128mb only, of cos can buy many 128mb card). Price wise they are similiar.
Kei is offline  
Old 21st January 2002   #6
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Robert

But for comparison sake and keeping resolution to the same, which (CF or SM) can hold more shots for 128MB?
Images are basically files which take up the same amount of space whether they're on a CF or SM. Different cameras would apply different amounts of compression and result in different file sizes.
mpenza is offline  
Old 21st January 2002   #7
YSLee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
Default

I guess the Fuji 2600 would probably be better for your budget.
YSLee is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #8
919956g
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: singapore
Posts: 372
Default

hey come

http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...131#post309131


feel free to drop comments
919956g is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #9
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 919956g
hey come

http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...131#post309131


feel free to drop comments
Why dig up this old thread???
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #10
kng
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 551
Default

Hi Robert, why don't you also consider the Canon A70? Its 3mp, 3x zoom and uses Cf cards which are prob the cheapest storage format in the market. The A70 also comes with full manual controls (aperture and shutter priority), manual focus mode, and you can add on polarisers and filters, teleconverters, etc etc. It appears that you can get it for about S$520. Add another $60 for 128m CF card and $22 for GP rechargeable batteries & charger and it comes to about $600.
kng is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #11
lennon
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by kng
Hi Robert, why don't you also consider the Canon A70? Its 3mp, 3x zoom and uses Cf cards which are prob the cheapest storage format in the market. The A70 also comes with full manual controls (aperture and shutter priority), manual focus mode, and you can add on polarisers and filters, teleconverters, etc etc. It appears that you can get it for about S$520. Add another $60 for 128m CF card and $22 for GP rechargeable batteries & charger and it comes to about $600.
I agree to this comment

Or you may want to consider getting a higher model + accessories, 2nd hand at the "buy and sell"
lennon is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #12
Tweek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 2,149
Default

eh guys, the original question was posted more than one year ago. Robert here has probably gotten his cam and shot many frames already.
Tweek is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #13
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tweek
eh guys, the original question was posted more than one year ago. Robert here has probably gotten his cam and shot many frames already.


I guess few ppl actually looked at the dates...
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 17th April 2003   #14
lennon
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by imaginary_number


I guess few ppl actually looked at the dates...
!!!
lennon is offline  
Old 28th April 2003   #15
Silverelf
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Near Equator
Posts: 261
Default

This is hilarious.... never noticed any price discrepancies either?
Silverelf is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.10594 seconds with 7 queries