![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 907
|
Hi, I took this picture on a full frame body, 17mm lens, f/22. This is a view of lower pierce reservior from upp pierce reservior.
The vignette effect came as a surprise, but I liked it a lot. There is also a light ring, like a flare around the sun. I'm not sure if it is a lens problem, or if it was a natural effect not visible to the naked eye at that time. I seek your feedback on 2 items: 1) your comments on the vignette 2) does the light ring bothers you (or if it is acceptable) 3) if you have any constructive comments, please drop a note too. thanks in advance for viewing and notes. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 803
|
Firstly i think i would try to correct the horizon, it looks slanted. The light ring does not affect me, however i thought this pic tonal range could it brought out more.
__________________
My Humble Flickr --> The pavement of my thoughts |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 907
|
actually, the horizon is not slanted (well, maybe a bit), but it's hard to tell as the shore line and the tree line was not tangent to my line of sight, hence you notice those 2 lines converge a bit. nonetheless, i do get what you mean. thanks for the feedback on tonal range. i know it's a problem and i haven't the time to burn the fore ground or do some HDR yet (i took 2 other shots at 0EV and +2EV). Finally, thanks for the feedback on the light ring. How about the Vignette? Is that a problem to anyone? |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
I am a strong fan of vignetting (but try not to overuse it), because it brings attention to a centralised (or near-center) subject. In this case, since the sun is a possible focal point, I guess it is okay to have the vignetting in the frame.
Honestly though, I don't think it is so much vignetting, but more of how the scene is lit. With only one light source, and underexposure such that the one light source is not blown out, there will be a natural light fall off. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,253
|
the mood is there, the exposure is great, even the huge amount of space is great but the composition spoils it all, the messy treeline and haphazard arrangement of the blackness/elements in silhouette leaves much to be desired - i am not so familiar with upper peirce but i am sure that moving to the left a wee bit and shooting the scene straight on might lead to an improvement, though i'm not 100% certain.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 907
|
![]() a recee picture to share, i happen to take another shot at landscape orientation. notice that the shadow of the trees inadvertently create the illusion that the horizon is not straight. this might answer Nigel's point on the horizon. on closer inspection, i may have stepped to the right from this shot when i took the picture in question. your suggestion might work afterall. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 803
|
hmmm i see i see. Now i understand. Thx.
![]()
__________________
My Humble Flickr --> The pavement of my thoughts |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,001
|
In this case, the horizon is not parallel to the camera, so even if its tilted its not obvious or detrimental to the composition. No issues with the vignetting but I would loose the flare, up the contrast and try a B&W conversion. I got a feeling this is going to be quite a killer B&W.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 39
|
Agreed, it could be a nice black nad white -- if only there was less overexposure. B+Ws rely too much on tonal range for this to be a good one. I mean, I can imagine that you'd see a vast patch of plain white in the centre of the photo - not very interesting. (:
And I feel that the first picture is less of a vignette and more of a light fall-off than the second picture. If you want a more defined vignette, using many filters may help. Haha.
__________________
Olympus Now and Forever |
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 907
|
as for B&W, i'll try it sometime later. learning other things now.
what's the difference between vignette and light fall off? i tot they are the same? |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|